327 300 1965 stocker

Alan Nyhus · 02-11-2020, 10:37 PM

Jim, we know what good 327-275's make so what we're looking at is....

-the difference between a good AFB and a good QJet
-what (if any) difference there is in the cam (.399/.399 on the 300 & .390/.410 on the 275)
-what (if any) difference there is in a good AFB intake compared to a good Qjet intake

The 327/300 @ 265 isn't horrible. But the 327/250 is the same engine (except for the 4G) and intake and it's @ 245. I don't see the AFB covering the 20 hp difference, even with the intake being a bit better on the AFB.....given the current state of Stocker intake technology.

But .60-.70 under should be no problem for a decent 327/300, though. -Al

02-11-2020, 10:37 PM	#11
Alan Nyhus VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Lower Dakota territory Posts: 1,180 Likes: 1,074 Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts	Re: 327 300 1965 stocker Jim, we know what good 327-275's make so what we're looking at is.... -the difference between a good AFB and a good QJet -what (if any) difference there is in the cam (.399/.399 on the 300 & .390/.410 on the 275) -what (if any) difference there is in a good AFB intake compared to a good Qjet intake The 327/300 @ 265 isn't horrible. But the 327/250 is the same engine (except for the 4G) and intake and it's @ 245. I don't see the AFB covering the 20 hp difference, even with the intake being a bit better on the AFB.....given the current state of Stocker intake technology. But .60-.70 under should be no problem for a decent 327/300, though. -Al __________________ "That'll never work....."