HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2013, 04:20 PM   #1
russellauto1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 2
Liked 35 Times in 6 Posts
Default B/PS lt1 formula

I am building a 93 formula with an lt1 for pure stock ihra and I am looking for some opinions on Torque converter and rear gear for that combination. As far as the converter, What stall range should I be in? RPM range of the engine is probally only 5500. Advantages, If any, of having the lockup disc in the converter. The transmission is a 4l60. What rear gear is suggested? I was thinking of a 4.10 or 4.56 with 28" tall tires. . Thanks
russellauto1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 04:37 PM   #2
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

Quote:
Originally Posted by russellauto1 View Post
I am building a 93 formula with an lt1 for pure stock ihra and I am looking for some opinions on Torque converter and rear gear for that combination. As far as the converter, What stall range should I be in? RPM range of the engine is probally only 5500. Advantages, If any, of having the lockup disc in the converter. The transmission is a 4l60. What rear gear is suggested? I was thinking of a 4.10 or 4.56 with 28" tall tires. . Thanks
Well you came to the RIGHT Place..

Another person is preparing a 93 Camaro on Class Racer.
Bullet has a Pure Stock Cam and Spring Package that will pass tech.
Even that it is about done by 6000rpm..

I am adding a Yank PT 4200 replacing my Yank SS3800 Converter.
Since my car is driven to the meets they are locking converters.

4.65 gearing with 28 inch would work well.
Would spend the money to get a complete Moser Rear.
The small 7.5 inch rear is ok at stock power levels.

Send pictures of your ride and will post it on the PhotoGallery.

Dan
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 04:49 PM   #3
russellauto1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 2
Liked 35 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

Are you going to be tuning the ecm also? I think I am going to get tuner cats ?
russellauto1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 05:09 PM   #4
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

The '93 has a removable chip. You would also need a device programmer, and eraser.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 06:01 PM   #5
russellauto1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 2
Liked 35 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

I guess the way I am reading the website, It comes as a package with the burner, Tuner program, and everything that is needed.
russellauto1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 06:24 PM   #6
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

Quote:
Originally Posted by russellauto1 View Post
I guess the way I am reading the website, It comes as a package with the burner, Tuner program, and everything that is needed.
Have TunerCat for 94 and 95 PCM..

Also use Byran Herter at PCMforLess.

They have a Dyno Facility near Quaker in Ohio and Farmington in North Carolina.

May want to ping Ed Wright on the Class Racer

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 07:03 PM   #7
chris ok
Senior Member
 
chris ok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New york
Posts: 592
Likes: 131
Liked 46 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

I'd speak to the man Ed Wright who posted above.
He is very knowledgeable from what I have read here.
chris ok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 07:35 PM   #8
ss3011
Senior Member
 
ss3011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

1993 was the only year that had a 700-R4 (4L60) but not the "e" version. Also the engine did not use a MAF sensor. When did IHRA drop the requirement that the correct part number camshaft be used ?
ss3011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 08:08 PM   #9
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

Quote:
Originally Posted by russellauto1 View Post
I guess the way I am reading the website, It comes as a package with the burner, Tuner program, and everything that is needed.
They may very well have a package like that.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2013, 10:11 PM   #10
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: B/PS lt1 formula

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss3011 View Post
1993 was the only year that had a 700-R4 (4L60) but not the "e" version. Also the engine did not use a MAF sensor. When did IHRA drop the requirement that the correct part number camshaft be used ?
I do not know that answer on the camshaft.
Mike Baker confirmed the rule in the IHRA book.
And model cam for my Impala SS

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.