|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]()
Wondering how a cylinder head gets treated if it is listed on a "Blueprint Spec Sheet" but not list on the "Accepted Products Sheet" with a correlating volume?
The obvious, current events, example would be the D7OE-DA cylinder head for a 1977 Ford 302.. ONLY D7 head listed is D7EE-CB.. Dissecting this part # would be 1977 "Unknown E" "Engine Part" -CB(revision/tooling #) D7OE-DA not listed.. Common sense says that the -DA version would be accepted at the same volumes as the -CB, but then again wouldn't one assume the -CB is legal than? Or if in fact the -CB was deemed illegal why not change the "Accepted Products Sheet" to match the newly deemed legal -DA version.. In a similar situation until recently for the 88-95 Ford 302 in a Mustang-- E7TE-PA and F1ZZ-B have been listed as legal.. Recently the F1ZZ-B number (which is only a book number not a cast number) was updated to read F1ZE-B which would be the number cast on the head.. "1991" "Mustang" "Engine part"... "Accepted Products Sheet" lists only "E7TE" no mention of the -PA (no other suffix exists so this isn't a huge problem), but no mention of this F1Z(ZE)-B.. there is a F1ZE-AA (which is an entirely different head and has different volumes listed from the E7 version) again common sense would say the -B head is legal at the E7 volumes but why not list it? I'm sure there are many more examples of this.... maybe there isn't.. I'm just familiar with these two so I'm able to elaborate on them a bit, but during a tear down what does NHRA do in this situation? Brad |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,731 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
My Pontiac 01 head was poured in a Natl. Event teardown YEARS ago. The numbers still aren't published in the Blueprint Spec. Sheet.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 502
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
If the head in question casting number is listed in the blue print specs it is a legal head to run.
Just because there is no runner volumes published doesn’t matter. It is not racers responsibility to publish them. It’s NHRA job. They gave you a list of legal heads to run and it’s there job to publish specs on head. RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
In Billy's 01 Pontiac case was he poured and compared to a known unpublished value to determine legality or was he poured to "set the standard"? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
My head for 307 Olds stocker had a cc volume in the books and I checked and my head matched their specs. Intake and exhaust
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 502
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
I think your giving them too much credit....
If they don’t post runner volume on a head that is posted as legal don’t worry about it. Just be sure that the head you run is exactly the same number listed as a legal head per NHRA.... If it’s a D70E- DA make sure it’s reads the same in blue print spec. When did a racer set the runner volume that’s listed in”NHRA Approved Products” list ????? It’s up to NHRA RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|