|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Have a Duster. Wanting to build for stock eliminator. Both engines fit same
class with 360 car holding a few more pounds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 2,803
Liked 2,487 Times in 698 Posts
|
![]()
Either one work OK.
Both are factored pretty hard and not cheap to build competitively.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 177
Likes: 204
Liked 253 Times in 95 Posts
|
![]()
If you have the parts the low compression 340 is a great motor. I think they are more durable than the 360. The pistons are fairly lite, the small main bearings and the small valve heads have good velocity, making a great reving little motor. It doesn’t make enough power to beat itself up.
For the most part the racers have maxed it out, so you won’t be seeing any big hp changes. From what we have learned over the years is the only thing a 340 and 360 have in common Is their appearance. They are two completely different animals. What works on one doesn’t work on the other. Look at the Vegas qualifying, 4 or 5 340’s and 1 360. George Mirza |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|