HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2017, 03:09 PM   #11
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
Absolutely not! All safety rules should be based on E.T. and mph. Physics is unaffected by what decals are on the windows. There's always going to be a line where there are additional safety requirements. It makes far more sense to have one line, instead of numerous arbitrary lines.

This is one of major problems that NHRA has now. The "index or class"-based safety rules that they currently have allow one 275hp combo to go 10.00 with a roll bar, -1 firesuit, etc, while mandating that another 275hp combo running 10.80 must have a full roll cage, -5 firesuit, competition license, and many other things. That is simply indefensible.
Excellent point. It makes sense. Problem is it is easier for tech to look at the decal on the window than figure out what each car actually runs. With the direction NHRA tech is going we know what way they will choose.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 08:42 PM   #12
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by novassdude View Post
Excellent point. It makes sense. Problem is it is easier for tech to look at the decal on the window than figure out what each car actually runs. With the direction NHRA tech is going we know what way they will choose.
Looking at the dial-in on the window is even easier.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 08:59 PM   #13
Bob Schmalz
Junior Member
 
Bob Schmalz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25
Likes: 11
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

So we would put our dial-in on the window before going to tech ?
__________________
Bob Schmalz 3199 Stock
Bob Schmalz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 09:18 PM   #14
reera
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 3
Liked 31 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

What do the metric guys do?
Only one place to get a shield. Tom waters race car products. Doesn’t clear case braces. On a 69 nova, it requires cutting/modifying floor pan more than rules allow for stock eliminator just to get it to fit. Run a blanket instead? This ain’t tractor pulling. Bye bye 350, hello 6 banger. V/SA here I come.

Ryan Walther
Stock 315
reera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 10:23 PM   #15
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 127
Liked 488 Times in 90 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Instead of worrying about blankets and shields, put a standard trans in your cars and see what fun it is racing and shifting gears. With Jericho and Gforce transmissions, reliability is at it's best. The biggest problem is figuring out the clutch, it's cheaper then converter's because you buy one and work with it. Breakage is minimal these days and repeatability is pretty easy.
Just a suggestion.

Casey Miles
248H Stock
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2017, 10:48 PM   #16
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
Looking at the dial-in on the window is even easier.
There is no dial-in on the window during qualifying.
Jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 05:39 AM   #17
Shaun Quill
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hockessin DE
Posts: 228
Likes: 32
Liked 105 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
Instead of worrying about blankets and shields, put a standard trans in your cars and see what fun it is racing and shifting gears. With Jericho and Gforce transmissions, reliability is at it's best. The biggest problem is figuring out the clutch, it's cheaper then converter's because you buy one and work with it. Breakage is minimal these days and repeatability is pretty easy.
Just a suggestion.

Casey Miles
248H Stock
Amen!!!!!
Shaun Quill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 07:17 AM   #18
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,446
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Signman View Post
Looks about right same as ET Racing. Never looked were 9 second and faster stockers not running a trans shield?

Looks like OEM electronic shift only so e-shift, electric and air shifters may be done.
Elegal shift is done? Or the shifter can't be electric controlled? Air shifters were allowed in stock? Big rule change here that needs some elaboration.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 09:40 AM   #19
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

OMG.... how do you think they do tech at bracket races? Go through tech: "How fast do you run?" "10.50's" "OK, you need XYZ." This is NOT hard.

And YES, the tech guys already watch E.T.'s. A friend has always wanted to run a 9.99 just once with his Stocker, but doesn't have a full cage. He was specifically told there would be no grace period. One 9.99 and he was out of the event.


Again, the idea that one car running 10.80's requires far more stringent safety standards than an identical car running 10.00 is ludicrous. It also creates a potentially massive problem with insurance. What happens when a 10-oh car wrecks with a roll bar, -1 suit, etc., and the insurance company says, "Why didn't this car and driver meet the same safety standards as this other car that's much slower, but requires a full cage, -5 suit, competition license, ad infinitum?"
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS

Last edited by Michael Beard; 11-03-2017 at 09:46 AM.
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2017, 09:52 AM   #20
SS3718
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 5
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Michael,
Some of the bracket races I've watched here lately doesn't appear to have any rules when it comes to safety....helmet mandatory, everything else is optional. It's not my style but it also doesn't directly impact me!

If you want the simplest rule when it comes to safety....everyone should wear the same thing and have the same requirements. After all, your 10.50 car is running against 8.50 cars going 160+.

Nick
SS3718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.