|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 700
Likes: 446
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.classracer.com/classforum...t=24721&page=2 Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 1013 David Ficacci 350 Doug Duell E4 0.053 10.091 129.08 ****WINNER**** 0.105 9.878 125.95 A/SA Dial: 11.00 (+/-): -0.909 A/SA Dial: 11.00 (+/-): -1.122 Prior rounds: E3 (D Rampy ) 0.059 10.980 0.900 (R Skipper Jr) 0.012 9.993 0.043 E2 (R Shaw ) 0.059 9.972 -1.028 (L Williams ) 0.072 9.957 0.047 E1 (O Birkett ) 0.038 10.200 0.030 (C Marshall ) 0.025 10.036 0.046 Qualified: #25 10.069 -0.931 #9 9.995 -1.005 Doug Duell's MOV: 0.1615 seconds (approximately 31 feet).
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
9.87 @ 125.96?? Really hung it out, didn't he? LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe his front air damn caught the beems early.....
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON 4044 STK,SS, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,351 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,814 Times in 413 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Doug beat Dave that year, and John Shaul. Not bad for the first year for the car, taking out two very fast and well developed cars, owned and campaigned by the same guys for years. And a 9.87 @ 125MPH means the car was probably capable of a mid 9.60 pass, at least. Every year, another batch of real soft factored combinations gets added. Many of them are nothing but paper, no car with that engine is ever actually produced, they just pick parts out of a catalog, assign a bogus soft factor, and NHRA puts it in the guide. And yet, there was a time when 50 of that car, with that engine, had to be produced and sold. Now, you don't even have to bolt an engine together, you can just write the blueprint specs on paper and send them in. Oh, I like Doug, a lot, super nice guy, we've pitted next to each other 3-4 times. Nice car, too.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,351 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 500
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
The original post should have read, "Name the number of times since 2009 that a old car beat a new car in Class/Eliminator, unless it was a throw away run by the New car"
I lost the Class final in E/SA @ Indy in 2013 to a new car. I went .988 under the index and the winner went 1.15 under backing in to me. I also had the same car and driver 1st round of Stock Eliminator at the same race. ......Can you say " Have a nice day". How many of the New car owners and drivers had old cars that were capable(fast and legal) of winning Class at Indy? I own and race a 67 Fairlane and a 2010 Mustang 352 CJ , both can run D/SA.......guess which one if faster?? RJ . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HOUMA, LA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Mr. RJ sir, thanks for your input and I understand where your coming from. I wasnt including Class wins because they are a different animal and usually they dont mean anything these days. I love class racing which is why I do have a new car. But when it comes time for eliminations the chance for a heads up is that common. Sir, how many different classes do both your cars fit in?
I wish NHRA would come up with some type of heads up racing for a STK or SS car like prostock. I even believe we asked for some sort of heads up racing but were denied by NHRA. So we play were we can play. I know some of us say that "advance" isnt the correct word but if techonolgy doesnt ADVANCE then how does the world grow? I guess we should all be using computers, phones, cars, and whatever else you can think of that has come from the 70's. I mean if in 44 years things havent advanced then how is the world like it is?? Hp factors as well as enging builders have had to change due to the changing times. Come on guys you cant really believe that a car built in the 70's, 80"s, or even the 90's should compete with cars built of today.
__________________
JOSEPH TEUTON 4044 STK,SS, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
In my opinion, that *should* be Pro Stock today. To see the factory race cars unleashed would be an incredible and engaging show. I'd like to feature something like this at an event, but have been waiting for NHRA to square things up. The Factory Stock concept is there, but seems to be all over the map right now. We'll try to do some research and attempt to have a plan in place for next year by the end of summer so people have time to plan for 2015.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
|
![]()
Joey it would be an honor to drive one of your chrysler cars.and i would park my bowtie today. just saying!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|