|
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since I'm not worried about the 2x2 flexing here is how I braced the crossmenber to the subframconnectors. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
ZRacer,
your design looks good, I like the crossmember being triangulated to the frame connectors. Also, I like your idea about removing the poly bushing and building a solid bushing to replace it. I had not thought of that. This is a good example of our information age, I really like being able to share ideas & thoughts. A fellow can usually learn something! [smile]
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
by tha way, what is the length of the S & W torque arm? [center of axle to center of front bushing?]
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, there is a lot to learn on this site as well as others like it. The torque arm setup was new to me and I had to do a lot of research before I realized just how it works. I actually got to talk to the engineer who designed it for GM. To really make this setup hook and have you car 60' well there is a lot more than just bolting this thing on.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
From what I understand it is 12" shorter that the stock one which I beleive is 56". That is from the top attachment point in the rear to the center point in the front. The shorter they are the harder hit on the tires.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 144
Liked 37 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
We used the S&W stuff in our Firebird stocker. Never had any problems and picked the 60' time up quite a bit. You cannot go wrong with that set up!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 162
Liked 216 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
I wonder if the racers listed in their ad auctually use them un modified or they modify them. I am hoping Mr Josey,or one of the others in their add will see this and chime in as to how best to use them. (modified or unmodified) I am sure there is something better than what I am currently using (SLP subframe connectors and a adjustable torque arm that has the plate bolted up in the tunnel. very heavy but all that was available back in 95-96 when I started bracket racing current car) Its time update I just want to make sure what I buy is what is the best bang for the buck so to speak.
Once again thanks again for all your opininons/help Rob Last edited by Rob Petrie E395; 12-16-2008 at 05:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
just my 2 cents i have 90 pontiac formula j/sa 2x3 tubing for sub frame connectors eibach srings r/r air bag lakewood control arms stock sway bar stock torque arm with homemade frontmount/ driveshaft loop 60fts low 1.40s in j/sa thanks for listening gene monahan 1021 stk
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
He doesn't use an anti-roll bar Gene has the stock sway bar. It is the old school set up air bags and sway bar. And hell it works!! Might be better with the s and w stuff. Who knows does some one what to donate so he can back to back the set ups????
__________________
No prep is king |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|