|
|
View Poll Results: Yay or Nay | |||
This is a net good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
85 | 44.97% |
This is a net bad |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 26.98% |
Don't care, I'm going to stay in my lane |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
53 | 28.04% |
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
I wasn't talking about the cars. I was talking about the crying...
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 916
Likes: 1,138
Liked 685 Times in 204 Posts
|
![]()
Last year at Indy, there were 5 ?Newer FS cars? in the top 16 for Stock. It seems to have leveled out from 10 - 12 years ago.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Do you honestly think that "10-12 years" is a reasonable amount of time for soft make believe paper combinations to "level out? Certainly you must also remember how many years it took some of the modern EFI cars, like the 4th gen Camaros (and Firebirds), with both the LT1 and LS engines to finally move up 5 or 6 classes, and how many older combinations were essentially "Robbed" in Class or heads up races in eliminations.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hendersonville, TN 37075
Posts: 225
Likes: 4
Liked 44 Times in 20 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|