Coming Soon.....

[Dan Bennett]

Just from reading him here and watching a couple of interviews Gump seems like a pretty good guy and I admire that he thrives on challenges and breaking new ground. But there's a couple of things in my mind about this whole deal.

So a T400 may have been used in BMWs. Stating the obvious, but the Supra is not a BMW. Toyota is one corporation, BMW is another whether they sometimes share technology or not. If he was building a Z4, I'd have no issue. This is just stretching the rules (and logic) much too far. I realize that when the factory cars were being introduced a lot of crazy thinking got approved.

Second, yes AMC did start using torqueflites but it was long before they were bought out. I owned a 68 AMX with a Borg Warner (T35?) which was nothing but problems. If my memory is correct, in 69 they started using the Mopar stuff. The pain from buying a year too early is still with me. I have a knack for that - I bought a new leftover 273/235 Barracuda in the summer of 67 just weeks before the 340 was introduced.

Finally, I know the horses left the barn, but there is no way this should be in the Stock classes.

[GUMP]

Originally Posted by Dan Bennett

Just from reading him here and watching a couple of interviews Gump seems like a pretty good guy and I admire that he thrives on challenges and breaking new ground. But there's a couple of things in my mind about this whole deal.

So a T400 may have been used in BMWs. Stating the obvious, but the Supra is not a BMW. Toyota is one corporation, BMW is another whether they sometimes share technology or not. If he was building a Z4, I'd have no issue. This is just stretching the rules (and logic) much too far. I realize that when the factory cars were being introduced a lot of crazy thinking got approved.

Second, yes AMC did start using torqueflites but it was long before they were bought out. I owned a 68 AMX with a Borg Warner (T35?) which was nothing but problems. If my memory is correct, in 69 they started using the Mopar stuff. The pain from buying a year too early is still with me. I have a knack for that - I bought a new leftover 273/235 Barracuda in the summer of 67 just weeks before the 340 was introduced.

Finally, I know the horses left the barn, but there is no way this should be in the Stock classes.

Read between the lines. The Supra was built by.... I PROVED that to the NHRA....

[TommyPettigrew3076]

Originally Posted by Dan Bennett

Just from reading him here and watching a couple of interviews Gump seems like a pretty good guy and I admire that he thrives on challenges and breaking new ground. But there's a couple of things in my mind about this whole deal.

So a T400 may have been used in BMWs. Stating the obvious, but the Supra is not a BMW. Toyota is one corporation, BMW is another whether they sometimes share technology or not. If he was building a Z4, I'd have no issue. This is just stretching the rules (and logic) much too far. I realize that when the factory cars were being introduced a lot of crazy thinking got approved.

Second, yes AMC did start using torqueflites but it was long before they were bought out. I owned a 68 AMX with a Borg Warner (T35?) which was nothing but problems. If my memory is correct, in 69 they started using the Mopar stuff. The pain from buying a year too early is still with me. I have a knack for that - I bought a new leftover 273/235 Barracuda in the summer of 67 just weeks before the 340 was introduced.

Finally, I know the horses left the barn, but there is no way this should be in the Stock classes.

Ok so by your logic though how does it work with stick shift cars from the 1990's ? The Borg Warner trans was used in Mustangs and Gm cars and trucks . All stick cars no matter what make can run a G force , Jerico , Liberty and thats not a problem . I did a little research and from what I can see the 8 speed used in the Supra is used in Chryslers cars so TECHNICALLY you could say it has a Chrysler auto so the Supra could use a 904