Rules Verification for a Newbie

[Sean Marconette]

Originally Posted by james schaechter

Wesley Roberson is working more events and training some of the new tech officials.

Pretty refreshing to see some checks going on again.

I agree, I would not expect a full on teardown at a points meet, but check the obvious safety stuff.

4 cars were booted due to loose ballast at sgmp race 1. They all fixed it and raced in race 2

They later checked some carbs and head casting numbers and rocker arms for stockers.

They also checked me for a clutchless.

They checked wheelbase on some SS cars.

Great way to tighten things up and get some training done.

I would look for more of this.

I heard there were checks at the Earlville Iowa race as well

I was one of the cars that was looked at at the National Open at Earlville, and I was #2 qualifier for both races that weekend. Anyone racing Stock or SS this is what we signed up for. If that means taking it apart to check its legal then you better make sure its legal, and be ready if asked. We need more checks that what we are racing is per the rules. Otherwise go bracket race. I agree with Jim, we need more tech checking cars.


Suggesting the guy that bought someone elses car is legal, and not checking it seems risky to me. The lack of a rear firewall would be one of the items I would take another look at on your car.

Sean

[Tony Corley]

Originally Posted by Sean Marconette

I was one of the cars that was looked at at the National Open at Earlville, and I was #2 qualifier for both races that weekend. Anyone racing Stock or SS this is what we signed up for. If that means taking it apart to check its legal then you better make sure its legal, and be ready if asked. We need more checks that what we are racing is per the rules. Otherwise go bracket race. I agree with Jim, we need more tech checking cars.


Suggesting the guy that bought someone elses car is legal, and not checking it seems risky to me. The lack of a rear firewall would be one of the items I would take another look at on your car.

Sean

Sean, it actually does have a firewall. The cell is recessed into the spare tire area, and it has an aluminum cover that Dzus fastens over the top of the wheel well, covering it completely. So no issues there. But there are some things I see that I know are not legal. Like it has an electric vacuum pump connected to the valve covers. I also am not certain that the current rods are listed in the legal replacements. ( Because truthfully, I’m not certain what they are). The build sheet part numbers don’t match anything I know of. And I want to CC the heads and make certain they’re legal. I don’t think the car was built illegal, but there have been rules changes since 2014, and this car had been caught in a time warp. It’s been sitting for the most part. I have to learn how NHRA polices the Stock and Super Stock cars, but I will rest easier knowing that every thing is up to date and legal. Thanks for the observations.

[Billy Nees]

I hope that after you get it apart that you can find enough parts to get it back together in a timely fashion.

[Tony Corley]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

I hope that after you get it apart that you can find enough parts to get it back together in a timely fashion.

I should have most of it already on the shelf. I?ve been messing with these sbf a long time. I have stacks of new coated bearings, gaskets, new (legal) rods, etc. I already have a set of the valve springs they have listed as being in it. The only thing I don?t have is piston rings, because I need to see what it has now. I also have a brand new ?68 based 302 shortblock sitting here that I was already building when I bought the car. New Boss block, Eagle crank(again the legal one, took me 2 years to find it lol). Good rods and pistons, just no heads yet. Looking for a set of the NHRA legal aluminum castings that aren?t made anymore. I was going to build a car, then this one showed up. So again, not really concerned about getting it back together. This thread got so far off track , lol. I just wanted to know if the carb had to have the exact casting number as listed, or as long as it was the same type, venture size and throttle size, would it be legal, lol

[Tony Corley]

This thread got so far off track. I really just wanted to know if my carb was legal. It has the correct Venturi size and throttle blade size, just not the correct 64 casting number. Otherwise, it’s identical to the ‘64 carb specs. And as I quoted from the rule book, it’s a little vague, unlike other sections that specify. Thanks everyone.