HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2025, 11:31 AM   #11
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,713 Times in 390 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

People are going to keep screwing around, trying to push the rules to get them changed (people are playing games with ring grooves, etc), keep pushing for "enhancements", and keep asking for parts, features, and functions that are, and have been for decades, specifically kept OUT of Stock Eliminator, and they're going to wake up and find that their class no longer exists.


When you make Stock closely resemble other classes, NHRA is going to decide to just "roll" Stock into something else.


In case you haven't noticed, people like Dave Ley, Redman, and others, who have long been our friends, who loved us, and our class, are being pushed out. NHRA doesn't want them, because they really don't want Stock, or Super Stock, for that matter. Who's next? Travis Miller?


Some of you people better stop dreaming, wake up, and realize, you're going to get what you asked for, because what you're really asking for is the end of Stock Eliminator.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 12:24 PM   #12
TOSTO RACING
Senior Member
 
TOSTO RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DRAGSTRIP
Posts: 878
Likes: 841
Liked 609 Times in 176 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Agree 100 percent

Pretty soon

Bracket 1 Super Stock
Bracket 2 Stock
__________________
5664 GHI/SA
CAMARO
TOSTO RACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 05-23-2025, 12:46 PM   #13
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 1,065
Liked 7,742 Times in 1,484 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
People are going to keep screwing around, trying to push the rules to get them changed (people are playing games with ring grooves, etc), keep pushing for "enhancements", and keep asking for parts, features, and functions that are, and have been for decades, specifically kept OUT of Stock Eliminator, and they're going to wake up and find that their class no longer exists.


When you make Stock closely resemble other classes, NHRA is going to decide to just "roll" Stock into something else.


In case you haven't noticed, people like Dave Ley, Redman, and others, who have long been our friends, who loved us, and our class, are being pushed out. NHRA doesn't want them, because they really don't want Stock, or Super Stock, for that matter. Who's next? Travis Miller?


Some of you people better stop dreaming, wake up, and realize, you're going to get what you asked for, because what you're really asking for is the end of Stock Eliminator.
The guy in the Black Stetson hat just said a mouthful. ….
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 01:12 PM   #14
MoJo Risen
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 181
Likes: 12
Liked 106 Times in 37 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOSTO RACING View Post
Agree 100 percent

Pretty soon

Bracket 1 Super Stock
Bracket 2 Stock
Don't forget you'll be lined up in the staging lanes with 60 junior dragsters along with 60 electic Karts to pull those Go Karts..
Someone told me that kids love the smell and taste of leaded racing fuel..
MoJo Risen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 01:22 PM   #15
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,713 Times in 390 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY View Post
The guy in the Black Stetson hat just said a mouthful. ?.



We grow too soon old, and too late wise.


I have had a lot of great teachers, some no longer with us. I try to speak what they taught me, they were the guys who built our classes. I'm just one of a later generation. I'm not in a position to race now. I'd like to see the classes continue, I might be able to later, or I might be able to bring in the next generation.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 10:03 AM   #16
Pat6868
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 5
Liked 75 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

A valve spring rule would have stopped all of this nonsense, and we all know how that worked out.
Pat6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 10:09 AM   #17
VE6DRW
Junior Member
 
VE6DRW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 29
Likes: 10
Liked 43 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
People are going to keep screwing around, trying to push the rules to get them changed (people are playing games with ring grooves, etc), keep pushing for "enhancements", and keep asking for parts, features, and functions that are, and have been for decades, specifically kept OUT of Stock Eliminator, and they're going to wake up and find that their class no longer exists.


When you make Stock closely resemble other classes, NHRA is going to decide to just "roll" Stock into something else.


In case you haven't noticed, people like Dave Ley, Redman, and others, who have long been our friends, who loved us, and our class, are being pushed out. NHRA doesn't want them, because they really don't want Stock, or Super Stock, for that matter. Who's next? Travis Miller?


Some of you people better stop dreaming, wake up, and realize, you're going to get what you asked for, because what you're really asking for is the end of Stock Eliminator.
Lots to digest in this post. For perspective, we've put a "mule" engine in our Stocker this year and are racing in PRO category. We wanted to focus on improving our race operations and logistics without wearing out the Stocker engine. To our surprise, we're having just as much fun, and the competition is every bit as fierce as Stock.

Maybe you have to decide if you love drag racing or just the machinations of Stock Eliminator.
__________________
Dave White
NHRA Stock/SS 606
VE6DRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 05-24-2025, 12:17 PM   #18
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,713 Times in 390 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VE6DRW View Post
Lots to digest in this post. For perspective, we've put a "mule" engine in our Stocker this year and are racing in PRO category. We wanted to focus on improving our race operations and logistics without wearing out the Stocker engine. To our surprise, we're having just as much fun, and the competition is every bit as fierce as Stock.

Maybe you have to decide if you love drag racing or just the machinations of Stock Eliminator.



The entire point of Stock and Super Stock is to choose what you believe is a competitive combination that you like, and attempt to out work and out think your competition to be faster.


The bracket racing component of the classes came later, to "save them from possible extinction".


The hard core people in the classes still seek to choose a competitive combination that they like, and try to be at least among the fastest, if not the fastest, in their respective class.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 12:45 PM   #19
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 708
Liked 1,521 Times in 567 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat6868 View Post
A valve spring rule would have stopped all of this nonsense, and we all know how that worked out.
I have to disagree. With the advent and use of NASCAR valvetrain technology, new camshaft lobe configurations, and the frequent use of Spintron testing, the spring pressures have been reduced considerably.

Many racers are going faster with lower spring pressures.
With the proper rocker arm and pushrod stiffness, lightweight valves, and retainers, and solid tappet/roller lifters, you can run lower spring pressures and still have a stable at high RPM's.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 01:50 PM   #20
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,523
Liked 1,713 Times in 390 Posts
Default Re: Stock Eliminator NHRA accepted pistons.

There was a valve spring rule in Stock, for decades.


Given the restrictions in the valve train in most Stock engines, and that the cam lobes haven't been redesigned (Comp sent Billy Godbold to a "contract as needed" position before he could rework them) in years, maybe decades, the advances in lobe design in NASCAR and the pro categories don't really apply to Stock. Billy was going to redesign his "fast" lobes to have his new "soft" ramps, and correct some other issues. We spoke at length. He never got the chance. I doubt Comp would pay him to do it now. The vast majority of cam companies don't even want to buy the cores anymore, and CWC doesn't want to make them.


It is interesting though, a bunch of lifter companies are making flat tappets with better materials and expensive coatings.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.