HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2024, 10:30 AM   #151
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

A few observations from a currently former competitor, who may or may not be able to return, due to health, and the resulting financial issues.


First, yes, everyone should have a place to race. However, everyone can't, and shouldn't, run Stock or Super Stock. No class, or even sport, can be everything to everyone. That's a recipe for disaster.


Second, anyone can see that NHRA has no real interest in increasing the car counts in either Stock or Super Stock. Some individuals at/in NHRA probably do, but corporate NHRA doesn't care.


Third, changing the triggers is probably the best possible "common ground" solution.


Fourth, you're never going to make everyone happy, and probably shouldn't even try. Actually, if you've pissed everyone off at least a little, and no one too much, you've probably gotten it about right.


Fifth, you're never going to get a "level playing field". No two humans are the same on a day to day basis, so what they accomplish won't be. And some combinations are never going to go very fast, some stuff just doesn't have any real potential.



Sixth, some people are willing to spend time and money to go fast, some aren't. It gets prohibitively expensive to try to keep money out with rules, and often to keep effort out with rules.


Finally, some people are going to choose slow combinations in lower classes, and they're not going to be willing to spend the money on aftermarket pistons, camshafts, etc, never mind power train (transmission, converter, etc) stuff to go fast. You're NEVER going to make them equal to or happy with the guys running fast stuff and building high end engines and transmissions.


Over my 45 plus years as a motorsports enthusiast, and competitor in several motorsports, I have seen attempts to make those sports and classes "fit everyone" absolutely destroy the sports over the long run. I've seen fast growing sports permanently stunted, and seen entire sports nearly disappear, with tracks closing, spectators leaving, and competitors quitting. It just doesn't work. Stock and Super Stock are probably the most hard core sportsman classes in drag racing, along with Competition Eliminator. The "casual competitor" is never going to really fit in, or be happy. Myself, I'm sidelined specifically because I can't be competitive right now in any way that I care to compete. I'm on the side lines helping people and trying to rebuild.


Y'all can take all that, or leave it, for whatever it's worth, or not worth.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 10:35 AM   #152
JGrossijr
Junior Member
 
JGrossijr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brentwood, California
Posts: 98
Likes: 380
Liked 460 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Excellent post Alan
JGrossijr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 12:22 PM   #153
Mark Madison
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 77
Liked 32 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
A few observations from a currently former competitor, who may or may not be able to return, due to health, and the resulting financial issues.


First, yes, everyone should have a place to race. However, everyone can't, and shouldn't, run Stock or Super Stock. No class, or even sport, can be everything to everyone. That's a recipe for disaster.


Second, anyone can see that NHRA has no real interest in increasing the car counts in either Stock or Super Stock. Some individuals at/in NHRA probably do, but corporate NHRA doesn't care.


Third, changing the triggers is probably the best possible "common ground" solution.


Fourth, you're never going to make everyone happy, and probably shouldn't even try. Actually, if you've pissed everyone off at least a little, and no one too much, you've probably gotten it about right.


Fifth, you're never going to get a "level playing field". No two humans are the same on a day to day basis, so what they accomplish won't be. And some combinations are never going to go very fast, some stuff just doesn't have any real potential.



Sixth, some people are willing to spend time and money to go fast, some aren't. It gets prohibitively expensive to try to keep money out with rules, and often to keep effort out with rules.


Finally, some people are going to choose slow combinations in lower classes, and they're not going to be willing to spend the money on aftermarket pistons, camshafts, etc, never mind power train (transmission, converter, etc) stuff to go fast. You're NEVER going to make them equal to or happy with the guys running fast stuff and building high end engines and transmissions.


Over my 45 plus years as a motorsports enthusiast, and competitor in several motorsports, I have seen attempts to make those sports and classes "fit everyone" absolutely destroy the sports over the long run. I've seen fast growing sports permanently stunted, and seen entire sports nearly disappear, with tracks closing, spectators leaving, and competitors quitting. It just doesn't work. Stock and Super Stock are probably the most hard core sportsman classes in drag racing, along with Competition Eliminator. The "casual competitor" is never going to really fit in, or be happy. Myself, I'm sidelined specifically because I can't be competitive right now in any way that I care to compete. I'm on the side lines helping people and trying to rebuild.


Y'all can take all that, or leave it, for whatever it's worth, or not worth.
Alan, You nailed it. As Jim, Said Excellent post.


Mark Madison
Mark Madison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 12:44 PM   #154
JP1738
Senior Member
 
JP1738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 576
Likes: 1,638
Liked 1,204 Times in 340 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Finally, some people are going to choose slow combinations in lower classes, and they're not going to be willing to spend the money on aftermarket pistons, camshafts, etc, never mind power train (transmission, converter, etc) stuff to go fast. You're NEVER going to make them equal to or happy with the guys running fast stuff and building high end engines and transmissions.
I feel attacked

I deliberately went with a slow car, in a low class, with moderate potential. Don't have to worry about heads up, bullet proof th350, hardy rotating assembly and valve train. I have no issue with people wanting to go fast, knock yourself out. If my combo takes a hit, I like that a whole lot less, but that's what I signed up for.

We (slow ppl) don't want the class to come to us, but we don't want it to run away either.
__________________
Dawson Pauley
#2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180
#2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide
JP1738 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 12:56 PM   #155
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP1738 View Post
I feel attacked

I deliberately went with a slow car, in a low class, with moderate potential. Don't have to worry about heads up, bullet proof th350, hardy rotating assembly and valve train. I have no issue with people wanting to go fast, knock yourself out. If my combo takes a hit, I like that a whole lot less, but that's what I signed up for.

We (slow ppl) don't want the class to come to us, but we don't want it to run away either.



Nope, not attacking anyone. just stating the facts. I've never said anyone wasn't welcome, just that no one is immune to the reality. And the reality is that both Stock and Super Stock are based on performance, and that being the case, that's where the focus must remain for the classes to survive, much less thrive.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 02:53 PM   #156
JP1738
Senior Member
 
JP1738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 576
Likes: 1,638
Liked 1,204 Times in 340 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Nope, not attacking anyone. just stating the facts. I've never said anyone wasn't welcome, just that no one is immune to the reality. And the reality is that both Stock and Super Stock are based on performance, and that being the case, that's where the focus must remain for the classes to survive, much less thrive.
No, I'm with you 100%, just being facetious.
__________________
Dawson Pauley
#2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180
#2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide
JP1738 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2024, 11:21 PM   #157
Cglrcng
Member
 
Cglrcng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 410
Likes: 1,571
Liked 334 Times in 185 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Hey Alan,

11 weeks plus June 2, 2022 waiting in line for NHRA Accepted Replacement Pistons Forged units from Ross and wrapped w/ custom ringsets made by Total Seal in all 4 holes,...Check. Aftermarket Cam...Check. Holley EFI being installed now (it wasn't that long ago that NHRA added the Terminator X to the accepted parts list), 1 big change at a ttimeI can do on my budget AND still keep making events and race too, plus I plan many more upgrades over time.

I just happen to be the slowest guy in the category currently (especially at elevation), if it wasn't me...It would be someone else.

I want fast guys to go as fast as they can possibly go in the other lane, I just want to be in the lane next to them doing the same.

The AHFS is their enemy, not me. And on the subject of an HP hit (due to the AHFS and engine family rules therein my specific 99hp combo was hit in June 2003 with 6hp (6?25.00lbs=150 extra lbs.) An A/SA taking a 6 hp hit=24 lbs. Extra.

The AHFS was instituted in what year? Is that important? It may just be as there is an engine family rule...Once an engine family has been hit with HP, is is no longer eligible for a reduction.

The combining of the FWD classes have caused an outlier concerning engine family hits as I see it. And that affected my combo huge. It is what it is...but it is not for lack of attempting to go faster.

1 step at a time, with lots of hard work. And it isn't for lack of expending labor or dollars. I have only been back at this 14 months racing it this time around, and 18 months prepping the car before that.

Not all slow guys are sitting still and doing nothing. And not all are also wrenching on a comp entry at the same time racing a stock entry to stay busy at the track because there is so much free time, and they know they assembled theirs themselves and breakage is not much of an issue. Not a complaint...I love doing it. I don't race a second car, so I get the experience and help another (Scott McClay), compete also that needs crew help. Cannot race that comp entry without a crew.

HP hits in the category are nowhere near eqitable across the classes top to bottom period.
__________________
Gary Lucier - 7832 STK. / 7832 E.T. EF/S Slow Sled. I am, but a simple test of your true patience. So, do all the really "Big Wheelies" you can!
Cglrcng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2024, 12:40 AM   #158
Mike Gray
Senior Member
 
Mike Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 311
Liked 687 Times in 198 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cglrcng View Post
Hey Alan,


The AHFS is their enemy, not me. And on the subject of an HP hit (due to the AHFS and engine family rules therein my specific 99hp combo was hit in June 2003 with 6hp (6?25.00lbs=150 extra lbs.) An A/SA taking a 6 hp hit=24 lbs. Extra.
.
If your 99hp combo was hit with 6hp (is it 99 now or 105) it doesn’t matter it is about 6.25% which according to AHFS is a run 1.350-1.399 under. A similar run in my A stock car results in +25hp or 200lb. (If I’m doing my math right)

Not saying your +6hp was right or wrong but the comparison is off a bit.
__________________
Mike 7570 A/SA

Last edited by Mike Gray; 11-16-2024 at 01:48 AM.
Mike Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2024, 09:40 AM   #159
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

Gary,
My position was not that the AHFS is perfect, it isn't. Nothing man made is.


It probably should be "graduated" a bit, top to bottom. I doubt they'll take the time and make the effort.


Nothing wrong with what you're doing, or how. I don't think anything in my post states that.




Mike,
Thanks for doing the math.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-16-2024, 03:10 PM   #160
Doug Domm
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 251
Likes: 29
Liked 84 Times in 21 Posts
Default Re: index lowering

?IF? indexes are lowered will the association racer groups such as Midwest Class Racers follow suit? Or will they keep the door open for the folks that still desire racing their S/SS based cars that can?t make the ?new? indexes?
Doug Domm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.