|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 449
Likes: 878
Liked 609 Times in 140 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I agree to a point but imo the 60-330 is just as important. You can dead hook and get a crazy low 60 but the engine and car are not working together and your et will reflect that. Again, my opinion only, but a short interval from 60 to the next clock point has to be there to enable a good run assuming you don't get loose downtrack. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Liked 735 Times in 386 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
That does depend. Over 10 years ago I was doing a simulation of a PSB with some help from George Bryce. I was able to get everything almost dead on. I ask George about the fact that I ran out of RPM before the finish line. He said he did too, but he gave up some MPH because it ran a lower ET. Stan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | ||
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
This photo is from my 2nd weekend out in the car in October of 2008 after licensing with the car the week before. ![]() In 2009 I swapped out the front shocks to Afco's bnc shocks and those same shocks are in place today. From then until the winter of 2022, when the front and rear suspensions were rebuilt as a part of updating and freshening this car from front to rear and top to bottom https://classracer.com/classforum/sh...t=86419&page=4 the car has been run with the same suspension settings other than adjusting the front shock extension on race day. The car as I run it today is about 200 lbs. heavier than when I bought 16 years ago and has far more power under the hood than when it was raced in Super Stock or when I bracket raced it footbraking. Last edited by 1320racer; 10-09-2024 at 05:13 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 838
Likes: 3,752
Liked 692 Times in 205 Posts
|
![]()
Ed how much clearance do you have from carb to hood with that setup?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Minimal. Basically the height of the Intensity Racing Products carb screen, about 1” to the top of the carb’s main body. That said, the carb gets air off the windshield and the nostrils at the front of the hood.
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by 1320racer; 10-09-2024 at 11:04 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 838
Likes: 3,752
Liked 692 Times in 205 Posts
|
![]()
Think you could be loosing a little cfm that close to the hood? Have you experimented with a different hood for just a tad more clearance? Just wondering.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
I could be. The carb is a custom deal that flows over 1350cfm. As to hoods, I considered it when the car was updated nearly 2 years ago because I wanted to put a taller intake manifold and dominator carb on so I bought 2 hoods, one a Joe Van O pin on cowl hood
![]() ![]() ![]() the other a VFN hinged cowl hood which I hated and didn't work with our carb location ![]() The Joe Van O hood looked good but a pin on hood doesn't work for how we race. I love the look of relatively quick/fast cars with an OEM flat hood just like my former Chevelle had. I returned the hinged hood but still have the Joe Van O hood which took 5 months to get and is for sale. ![]() FYI, the intake manifold on my engine has been with me since 2007 ![]() first installed on the Chevelle’s last engine. It is fully ported, runners extended and the carb pad cut down, done by BCHS for hood clearance and it’s been on every engine in the firebird. Last edited by 1320racer; 10-09-2024 at 11:23 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|