|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the info folks. That Camaro is flying. It makes me wonder how much better the aero is on it vs. my 66' Chevy II.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
I think there is a site that has the CD for each body style.
If you can find it you can see the aero difference in Camaro and Chevy11. I think it was SSDIV6 (Joe) that sent it to me, but several computer upgrades has lost it. If I remember it was a pretty interesting study..Some cars I thought were bad Aero were really pretty good & the opposite, too.. OH! one other thought...when picking a class With most of the 6 or 7 cars running the same engine combination going .7 or better and there might be a AHFS adjustment or two along the way.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 06-24-2024 at 01:18 PM. Reason: sp + add |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 389
Likes: 1,655
Liked 753 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
This tool may also help you.
https://hpwizard.com/aerodynamics.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 852
Liked 595 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As usual, a mostly not related piece of trivia. When I was most active in racing in the mid 80s thru 2000 or so - Pro Stock, so think Cutlasses, Thunderbirds, etc - the lowest Cd listed in the GM wind tunnel was a 4 door Cutlass. Evidently because of a longer, flatter, roof with a different backlight angle. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|