|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Webster, New York
Posts: 203
Likes: 446
Liked 188 Times in 82 Posts
|
![]()
I was just thinking if I was 25 again and I had a newer Camaro with a V6 how could I race it in Stock Eliminator? So I went to the classification guide and it shows the COPO's but none of the V6's in Gen5 or Gen6. These V6's are around 300 HP! Am I missing something? If someone wanted to race one of these Camaros how would they do it? Or more importantly how could Billy do it?
Are the newer Chrysler and Ford V6's in the same situation? Happy Thanksgiving! Ray
__________________
Ray Bassett I/SA 1687, SS/DA 1687 "SuperPro is both", unknown |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 1,098
Liked 659 Times in 196 Posts
|
![]()
A racer would need to contact the manufacturer and request the specifications be sent to NHRA. If there is interest in a combination it could make it in the guide. If it’s not in the guide, the car doesn’t exist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Webster, New York
Posts: 203
Likes: 446
Liked 188 Times in 82 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Dyno. I am in a unique situation being that I work for GM so I will contact Chevrolet. I hope by Mopar and Ford buddies will do the same with their V6's. To me this is one of the most obvious on ramps of a young person to Stock Eliminator. Happy Thanksgiving! Ray
__________________
Ray Bassett I/SA 1687, SS/DA 1687 "SuperPro is both", unknown |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,587
Likes: 1,872
Liked 10,591 Times in 2,190 Posts
|
![]()
When the 10k was offered for AA/S I started looking for cars to fit the class. After a few phone calls I decided a 5.3 Shelby would fit nicely. Problem, the cars not in the guide. I contacted NHRA and found out that the manufacturer never submitted the specifications to NHRA and that is the reason some cars are not in the guide.
Last edited by Larry Hill; 11-24-2023 at 05:52 AM. Reason: its 10 not 30k |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Webster, New York
Posts: 203
Likes: 446
Liked 188 Times in 82 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Larry. Seems to me there is nothing to loose to get the manufacturers to submit the specs. If that Shelby was submitted you would be building a car right now. I would suggest we as a community try to get specs for all cars submitted to NHRA.
While I am at it are there other Chevrolets that are not in the guide that I should request? Ray
__________________
Ray Bassett I/SA 1687, SS/DA 1687 "SuperPro is both", unknown |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 2,050
Liked 2,171 Times in 505 Posts
|
![]()
Ray,
You have a PM.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 3,564
Liked 7,596 Times in 1,718 Posts
|
![]()
Ya know, where would S/SS be today if back in the "old days" the manufacturers and NHRA would have supported only their top shelf, High Performance/ Race packages?
There wouldn't BE a S/SS today. There were WAY more 283/220 Biscaynes built than 427/425 ones and I have to wonder what the ratio of 350/255s to 396/375s might be? I know that it will never happen but it would be nice if a "forward-thinking" NHRA official or two would try and put together an affordable (for lack of a better term) Junior Stock program using the Under Classmen of Stock. Maybe N/S and down and the FWD stuff (you know, the "cheap" stuff) which, if supported correctly, could become the now nonexistent "entry level" class.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tomsriver nj
Posts: 471
Likes: 70
Liked 203 Times in 82 Posts
|
![]()
The Camaro 4 cyl. Turbo & Chevy SSR LS2 motor maybe some others
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 2,050
Liked 2,171 Times in 505 Posts
|
![]()
I think that the four cylinder would be a great combination. I got really close to building one before Jamie Meyer left Chevrolet Performance.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,846
Liked 5,003 Times in 1,903 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
NHRA seems to be obsessed with the back door , non- showroom late models. New style Camaros and such appear in Stock, Super Stock, Comp, Showdown, now in "X" , Pro Stock.. Some of these cars are even slated to be discontinued, but they don't seem to care. By no means are any of these combos considered entry level. Conspiracy theory here..The more expensive these classes become, the more they can charge for entries, meanwhile doing away with contingency award money.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|