HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2023, 11:10 AM   #1
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Adger -
Quoting a dear and common friend of ours, "What is legal is what passed tech."

My Camaro was a '67 so I never tried the spoilers. I even ran the OEM 4-piston disc brakes when it was raced as a Z28. It's kinda like hoping the psychology of having the obvious cheating areas clean they won't continue looking. Bob Ayres also taught me to have something very obviously wrong (but easy to correct) when you go through tech so they will stop looking after they "Gotcha!".
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 11:53 AM   #2
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 25
Liked 553 Times in 216 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

My good friend and co-worker was running C/SM with a '69 Camaro in the late 70's and at the Etown Summernats was told by Tech he was fine with just the front spoiler. At the scales after a run a guy I only knew as Joe Tech said he was DQ'ed if he did not have both front and rear. A call back and forth and some discussion with various people he was allowed to run with just the front.....and I don't recall the issue ever coming up again.
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 03:07 PM   #3
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 2,667
Liked 2,753 Times in 974 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

The late great Dave LeBrun didn't have spoilers on his Camaros.
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 08:01 AM   #4
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

As a final anecdote on the gen 1 Camaro spoilers, for most of two seasons before I built the '67 stocker I drove a '67 Camaro E-F/MP car that the owner had installed front and rear spoilers on. This was a 130mph car, much faster than the 100mph stockers I was used to driving. I got him to allow me to remove the spoilers for a while and made approximately 15-18 passes without the spoilers over three weekends. It's hard to say about the ET, but the MPH was easily .7-1.4 faster. In the end he put the spoilers back on because "he liked the way it looked." ??? I didn't last much longer with that arrangement.
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 03:27 PM   #5
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 25
Liked 553 Times in 216 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
As a final anecdote on the gen 1 Camaro spoilers, for most of two seasons before I built the '67 stocker I drove a '67 Camaro E-F/MP car that the owner had installed front and rear spoilers on. This was a 130mph car, much faster than the 100mph stockers I was used to driving. I got him to allow me to remove the spoilers for a while and made approximately 15-18 passes without the spoilers over three weekends. It's hard to say about the ET, but the MPH was easily .7-1.4 faster. In the end he put the spoilers back on because "he liked the way it looked." ??? I didn't last much longer with that arrangement.
I was at Gainesville around 1985 and looked at your '67 Camaro Stocker and thought it was a very nicely done car.
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2023, 06:49 PM   #6
PozQB14
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Youngsville, NC
Posts: 129
Likes: 24
Liked 42 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Kind of off topic but still related to 69 camaros. It's my understanding the 850 carb on a ZL1 didn't have a choke on it from the factory, correct? If so, why does nhra make it mandatory?
PozQB14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2023, 08:00 PM   #7
1347
Senior Member
 
1347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 513
Likes: 1,052
Liked 1,025 Times in 281 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by PozQB14 View Post
Kind of off topic but still related to 69 camaros. It's my understanding the 850 carb on a ZL1 didn't have a choke on it from the factory, correct? If so, why does nhra make it mandatory?
I just did a google search for ZL1 carbs, and everyone I found has a choke plate, including some 3000 dollar plus restoration and original carbs.
Where is the info that they had no chokes?
__________________
Duane Hoven

1342 SS/GT
1347 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2023, 06:31 AM   #8
Adger Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
Adger -
Quoting a dear and common friend of ours, "What is legal is what passed tech."

My Camaro was a '67 so I never tried the spoilers. I even ran the OEM 4-piston disc brakes when it was raced as a Z28. It's kinda like hoping the psychology of having the obvious cheating areas clean they won't continue looking. Bob Ayres also taught me to have something very obviously wrong (but easy to correct) when you go through tech so they will stop looking after they "Gotcha!".
Yes Dwight, Our Mutual friend has said that many times.
Reminds me of some long conversations you and I have had about rules & racing in general. Our friend also says there is no Gray between the black and white lines of the rule book.
But You and I know different. lol
I think there are a couple of Dwight rules in the book as well as a couple of Adger rules. I bet we could come up with a pretty good list of "Named Rules"
Might even be considered it a list of Who's Who in class Racing.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS)

Last edited by Adger Smith; 04-07-2023 at 06:33 AM. Reason: sp
Adger Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 04-07-2023, 07:12 AM   #9
Paul Merolla
Senior Member
 
Paul Merolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 611
Likes: 244
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro SS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adger Smith View Post
Yes Dwight, Our Mutual friend has said that many times.
Reminds me of some long conversations you and I have had about rules & racing in general. Our friend also says there is no Gray between the black and white lines of the rule book.
But You and I know different. lol
I think there are a couple of Dwight rules in the book as well as a couple of Adger rules. I bet we could come up with a pretty good list of "Named Rules"
Might even be considered it a list of Who's Who in class Racing.
Sounds to me like we need a new thread, Adger and Dwight...inquiring minds want to know!
Paul Merolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.