HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2023, 07:40 PM   #1
Kirk Morgan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
Default 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Iam building the 352 Cobra Jet and what is the opinion of using motor plates in this application. Pros and cons.
Thanks Kirk
Kirk Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2023, 10:19 PM   #2
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 693
Liked 1,458 Times in 544 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Morgan View Post
Iam building the 352 Cobra Jet and what is the opinion of using motor plates in this application. Pros and cons.
Thanks Kirk
When allowed by the rules, use motor plates.
Use the centered front plate, not the offset plate.
Racecraft and ATF make a plate for either using the OEM timing cover or Jesel Belt.
They also make a plate if using the 1994-1995 timing cover, which it is different than the earlier engines.

https://www.racecraft.com/motorplates-c-284/

https://www.atfspeed.com/14-Inch-Thick_c_365.html
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-01-2023, 08:00 AM   #3
427FE
Member
 
427FE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Monroe Twsp, NJ
Posts: 179
Likes: 226
Liked 310 Times in 69 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Theres no cons. You support the engine front and back which takes alot of stress off the block. Ties the front together. And with the motor mounts removed, it increases header clearance. Taking the engine in and out is easier too. You can mount things on the plate like a coil or whatever have you.
__________________
Pat Clemente

#1427 B/S
427FE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 02:25 PM   #4
Kirk Morgan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Do they make a special starter for proper engagement to the flex plate or am i over thinking this? I would need spacers for the torque converter spacing which is no problem and i would need to recheck the driveshaft for fitment also. Anything else?
Thanks Kirk
Kirk Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 03:19 PM   #5
Hacksaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 151
Liked 278 Times in 153 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Morgan View Post
Do they make a special starter for proper engagement to the flex plate or am i over thinking this? I would need spacers for the torque converter spacing which is no problem and i would need to recheck the driveshaft for fitment also. Anything else?
Thanks Kirk
I would make your mid plate from 1/8" mild steel and everything should work. If you go 1/4" alum. then you need to change the snout on the convertor so it doesn't pull away too far from the pump in the trans.
Hacksaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 03:23 PM   #6
Kirk Morgan
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Good idea. The engine already has a 1/16 block plate so just leave it out and add a 1/8 plate to it.
Thanks
Kirk Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 06:25 PM   #7
1347
Member
 
1347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 454
Likes: 932
Liked 928 Times in 241 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hacksaw View Post
I would make your mid plate from 1/8" mild steel and everything should work. If you go 1/4" alum. then you need to change the snout on the convertor so it doesn't pull away too far from the pump in the trans.
1/8" is too thick in my opinion, my Comp Engineering mid plate is the same thickness as my factory block plate. It came with a spacer to bolt behind the flex plate to.bring the trans/flexplate and started back to the original alignment. I'm gonna say its no thicker than .062.
__________________
Duane Hoven

1342 SS/GT
1347 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 09:50 PM   #8
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,474
Likes: 2,652
Liked 4,574 Times in 1,733 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hacksaw View Post
I would make your mid plate from 1/8" mild steel and everything should work. If you go 1/4" alum. then you need to change the snout on the convertor so it doesn't pull away too far from the pump in the trans.
"Snouts" (hubs) on converters are changed routinely, but "long" converters are usually built by adding a button to the pilot and using spacers on the mounting tabs. This way they can be brought back to OEM stack height more easily ;-)
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-02-2023, 01:24 PM   #9
SBillinson
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

I agree with SSDiv6 about using a center motor plate.

I use one that's offset and it's going to be changed. Too bad I put a new rear end housing in the car with MW axles three years ago for the offset engine.

Apart other benefits, centering the engine provides more room for headers.

You may have to offset/relocate the steering column if the shaft connecting to the rack gets in the way of exhaust ports. You can use spacers on the column mounts to move things up or down. You may want to fabricate or buy a tube-style column. That'll reduce some weight and allow you to mount it to suit your needs.
__________________
SS/BS 1921
SBillinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2023, 01:32 PM   #10
SBillinson
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
Default Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1347 View Post
1/8" is too thick in my opinion, my Comp Engineering mid plate is the same thickness as my factory block plate. It came with a spacer to bolt behind the flex plate to.bring the trans/flexplate and started back to the original alignment. I'm gonna say its no thicker than .062.
I'm not sure where CE is sourcing their material these days. I bent the hell out my mid plate after about 10 runs. They're 0.90" thick I believe. I ended up having to weld two of them together and rosette weld all over the place to get them rigid enough.
__________________
SS/BS 1921
SBillinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.