|
01-31-2023, 07:40 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
|
1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Iam building the 352 Cobra Jet and what is the opinion of using motor plates in this application. Pros and cons.
Thanks Kirk |
01-31-2023, 10:19 PM | #2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 693
Liked 1,458 Times in 544 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Quote:
Use the centered front plate, not the offset plate. Racecraft and ATF make a plate for either using the OEM timing cover or Jesel Belt. They also make a plate if using the 1994-1995 timing cover, which it is different than the earlier engines. https://www.racecraft.com/motorplates-c-284/ https://www.atfspeed.com/14-Inch-Thick_c_365.html |
|
Liked |
02-01-2023, 08:00 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Monroe Twsp, NJ
Posts: 179
Likes: 226
Liked 310 Times in 69 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Theres no cons. You support the engine front and back which takes alot of stress off the block. Ties the front together. And with the motor mounts removed, it increases header clearance. Taking the engine in and out is easier too. You can mount things on the plate like a coil or whatever have you.
__________________
Pat Clemente #1427 B/S |
Liked |
02-01-2023, 02:25 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Do they make a special starter for proper engagement to the flex plate or am i over thinking this? I would need spacers for the torque converter spacing which is no problem and i would need to recheck the driveshaft for fitment also. Anything else?
Thanks Kirk |
02-01-2023, 03:19 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 151
Liked 278 Times in 153 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2023, 03:23 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 30 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Good idea. The engine already has a 1/16 block plate so just leave it out and add a 1/8 plate to it.
Thanks |
02-01-2023, 06:25 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 454
Likes: 932
Liked 928 Times in 241 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
1/8" is too thick in my opinion, my Comp Engineering mid plate is the same thickness as my factory block plate. It came with a spacer to bolt behind the flex plate to.bring the trans/flexplate and started back to the original alignment. I'm gonna say its no thicker than .062.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
02-01-2023, 09:50 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,474
Likes: 2,652
Liked 4,574 Times in 1,733 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
"Snouts" (hubs) on converters are changed routinely, but "long" converters are usually built by adding a button to the pilot and using spacers on the mounting tabs. This way they can be brought back to OEM stack height more easily ;-)
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
Liked |
02-02-2023, 01:24 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
I agree with SSDiv6 about using a center motor plate.
I use one that's offset and it's going to be changed. Too bad I put a new rear end housing in the car with MW axles three years ago for the offset engine. Apart other benefits, centering the engine provides more room for headers. You may have to offset/relocate the steering column if the shaft connecting to the rack gets in the way of exhaust ports. You can use spacers on the column mounts to move things up or down. You may want to fabricate or buy a tube-style column. That'll reduce some weight and allow you to mount it to suit your needs.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
02-02-2023, 01:32 PM | #10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Mustang Super Stocker
Quote:
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
|
|
|