No Blinders

[MR DERBY CITY]

Originally Posted by Adub464Q

Don’t forget…all stock rules translate to super stock unless otherwise noted.

Therefore, blinders are gone in stock and super stock.

Ugh, I don’t think so …..

[Adub464Q]

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY

Ugh, I don’t think so …..

You sure about that MJ?

[MR DERBY CITY]

Originally Posted by Adub464Q

You sure about that MJ?

Austin, when dealing with this organization …I am not sure about much of anything anymore ……

[Spyphish]

My fault. I hit the 2.04 billion Powerball in Nov. and asked for rack and P in the AH cars. "Yes sir Mr. Hebert" Then last week I hit the 1 billion Mega loto and asked for no blinders. "Yes sir Mr. Hebert". It's warm and dry under the bus. Phish

[Future Super Stocker]

To many cry babies most likely. So a sunvisor which is a factory item needs to be removed? I highly think NOT! Stop it already!

[Jim Caughlin]

Originally Posted by Future Super Stocker

To many cry babies most likely. So a sunvisor which is a factory item needs to be removed? I highly think NOT! Stop it already!

OEM sun visors are still legal. What I pointed out is that most SS and Stockers have roll cages so the sun visor likely can't be flipped up and down. Based on that, mine will be in a permanent down position (which is totally legal per the currently written rules) but a much larger obstacle to my forward vision than my current 8 sq inches of blinder. If those are the new rules, so be it but not well thought out.

[Alan Roehrich]

Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin

OEM sun visors are still legal. What I pointed out is that most SS and Stockers have roll cages so the sun visor likely can't be flipped up and down. Based on that, mine will be in a permanent down position (which is totally legal per the currently written rules) but a much larger obstacle to my forward vision than my current 8 sq inches of blinder. If those are the new rules, so be it but not well thought out.

Another EXCELLENT example of poorly written rules, especially those driven by insurance companies and lawyers.

[Jim Caughlin]

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

Another EXCELLENT example of poorly written rules, especially those driven by insurance companies and lawyers.

After my conversations with NHRA and reading between the lines, I have no doubt that this was a result of lawyers and probably a lawsuit. I also have no doubt that there will be no upcoming compromise on this new rule, it is what it is.

[L.Fite]

Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin

After my conversations with NHRA and reading between the lines, I have no doubt that this was a result of lawyers and probably a lawsuit. I also have no doubt that there will be no upcoming compromise on this new rule, it is what it is.

So...
By that logic, we have to wait for someone to get run over by another class that uses blinders and sue before it's banned in that class?

(I have no dog in this fight, just asking)