HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2022, 03:17 PM   #1
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: 65-85 under.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Precht View Post
Would you then be in favor of running a manifold from an Olds that came on late 50s engines along with an AFB that flows 575 cfm in place of your QJ that flows 800 cfm. Would you give up the valve to piston clearance and long stroke that allows you so much more cam than the 426 SW can run.
So the combo just got horsepower and is still rated 70 horsepower below the factory rating.The Oldsmobile driver just "needs to work on the car".
BTW,I don't get the 800.And it was checked at St Louis by tech.

Gotcha.
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2022, 05:09 PM   #2
Paul Precht
Senior Member
 
Paul Precht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 730
Likes: 353
Liked 309 Times in 118 Posts
Default Re: 65-85 under.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442OLDS View Post
So the combo just got horsepower and is still rated 70 horsepower below the factory rating.The Oldsmobile driver just "needs to work on the car".
BTW,I don't get the 800.And it was checked at St Louis by tech.

Gotcha.
They bring a flow bench to tear down, never saw that.
Paul Precht is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.