|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Liked 456 Times in 148 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Calling Stock Eliminator a performance class is in question with these changes. Steve Teeter Stk/SS 620 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,862 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
Calling Stock Eliminator "Stock Eliminator" is in question also with all of the changes.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]()
Alas, it's all we have!
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 623
Liked 1,958 Times in 593 Posts
|
![]()
lots of racers have been asking for the AHFS to be changed. Now there is a change. You can still run as fast as you want. You just have to pay the price with a HP hit if you go too fast. I think this is a better situation than lowering the indexes across the board again. I am not sure why the runs under .65 do not count toward the average. All runs except aborted or incomplete runs should be counted.
People complain all the time about 1000 ft racing. Run your cars all out and take the hit and then you can run the full 1/4 mile. Might take a few hits for some combos. People have been playing the game so long that they have gotten used to it as the norm.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|