|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 1,085
Liked 7,965 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
![]()
Boy, I am really confused. Was Yac’s National Event winner FWD a Muscle car ?? Obviously I am asking for a friend …..
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
Savoys, Belvederes. etc. are intermediate Chryslers, but race hemis weren't borrowed from their full size line so they don't qualify either ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Monroe Twsp, NJ
Posts: 192
Likes: 260
Liked 348 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
They were considered full size at the time. IMHO a traditional muscle car would be up to the year of 1965
__________________
Pat Clemente #1427 B/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 2,605
Liked 2,737 Times in 965 Posts
|
![]()
My favorite "Muscle Car" is the 1969.5 (A12) Plymouth Road Runner 440 6bbl. Steve Wann has "tuned up" a few with great results in Stock Eliminator.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 2,389
Liked 3,192 Times in 975 Posts
|
![]()
Graduated from high school in 1967 and think everyone considered GTO’s, Road Runners, Super Bee’s, Chevelles, GS Stage cars, WO Cutlasses, etc all muscle cars. Don’t think anyone would have considered Camaros like the Yenko’s, Six Pack E bodies, etc anything but muscle cars. Hemi cars built by several would qualify as candidates for some of the quickest in Stock.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
From Wiki :
The first generation of the GTO is credited as popularizing the muscle car market segment in the 1960s.[2][3] The Pontiac GTO is considered by some to have started the trend with all four domestic automakers offering a variety of competing models. Origins (of the GTO) In early 1963, General Motors' management banned divisions from involvement in auto racing. This followed the 1957 voluntary ban on automobile racing that was instituted by the Automobile Manufacturers Association.[6] By the early 1960s, Pontiac's advertising and marketing approach was heavily based on performance. With GM's ban on factory-sponsored racing, Pontiac's managers began to emphasize street performance. In his autobiography Glory Days, Pontiac chief marketing manager Jim Wangers, who worked for the division's contract advertising and public relations agency, states that John DeLorean, Bill Collins, and Russ Gee were responsible for the GTO's creation. It involved transforming the upcoming second-generation Pontiac Tempest (which reverted to a conventional front-engine with front transmission configuration) into a sporty car, with a larger 389 cu in (6.4 L) Pontiac V8 engine from the full-sized Pontiac Grand Prix hardtop coupe in place of the standard 326 cu in (5.3 L) V8. By promoting the big-engine option as a special high-performance model, they could appeal to the youth market (which had also been recognized by Ford Motor Company's Lee Iacocca, who was at that time preparing the Ford Mustang variant of the second generation Ford Falcon compact). The GTO disregarded GM's policy limiting the A-body intermediate line to a maximum engine displacement of 330 cu in (5.4 L). The development team discovered a loophole in the policy which does not restrict large engines to be offered as an option.[1] Pontiac general manager Elliot "Pete" Estes approved the new model with sales manager Frank Bridge limiting initial production to 5,000 cars. As a great radio host once said "words mean things " Carry on...
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I’d prefer Mid Size Muscle Car…..
The definition of a muscle car is a bit more nebulous, because there was no single model that spawned the muscle car wars. But the recipe is simple enough: Drop a huge V8 into a two-door coupe and optimize only for straight-line speed. Raw power, lack of sophistication, and that distinctly American swagger are the hallmarks of all the great muscle cars. Last edited by Barry Polley; 12-04-2022 at 12:52 PM. |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 871
Likes: 272
Liked 1,345 Times in 410 Posts
|
![]()
Even though I'm a Mopar guy now. I always thought the 1965 Pontiac 2plus2 was a great looking hotrod. !967 427 fastback Impala was very cool too.
Paul Haszlauer |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 853
Liked 595 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
This gets tricky since the question was about cars currently being racing but we're sidetracked on definition. It was probably different for a lot of people.
If you look back, the cars we're talking about weren't originally called muscle cars. Check any mid 60s magazine with tests of these cars and they were referred to as super cars. Muscle car came later. For me, it was the cars we were racing back then, on the street and on the strip. Note that the statute of limitations has expired [lol) Some cars were considered worthy and it was almost never the family car. My definition is any 60s to early 70s (before smog) performance package car. By that I mean that a 327/300 was an upgrade from the standard 327/250 but was not a muscle car. A L79 certainly was. My best (though a bit vague) shot is a car with increased camshaft, intake manifold, compression ratio, and probably what the manufacturers classed as severe duty rear end and suspension. Last edited by Dan Bennett; 12-04-2022 at 02:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Wikipedia definitions are just the opinions of whoever wrote the entry. A muscle car is whatever you think it is. I graduated HS in 1971 and any two-door sedan with a high performance or tricked-out engine was considered a muscle car in those circles. The term "muscle" as related to cars of that day and age was pretty non-specific in terms of body style, but always related to performance, mainly drag race. Witness FoMoCo's parts and information catalog from 1969/1970 which was titled "Muscle Parts" and is quite an interesting read. Check out the price list in the back!
https://www.mustangtek.com/Library2/MuscleParts.html
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|