"Live From" Atco, NJ PC Richard Open

[CMcAllister]

Originally Posted by Barry Polley

No bashing. It’s a discussion.
Older seats aren’t as strong as the Kirkey or accepted seats. I know looks come into play but safety trumps that. We need the side support and head/ neck support in case of an event. It’s a good call and a great option- IMO.

The Jaz aluminum seats are smaller and less obvious than the KIrkeys. And can be made to look almost like vintage muscle car buckets when finished right. And they are lighter.

[Joe Martens]

I went with the Jaz aluminum seats and MJ Quinn did custom covers to replicate '69 Camaro seats!

[MR DERBY CITY]

Originally Posted by Joe Martens

I went with the Jaz aluminum seats and MJ Quinn did custom covers to replicate '69 Camaro seats!

. Them are some good lookin seats ….. …….. ……….

[Mark Ugrich]

Originally Posted by Frank Castros

Race seats look ridiculous in classic Stockers. I know I will be bashed for this comment for all the right reasons. So be it.

I can’t say they look ridiculous, but they do look out of place in some cars.I used kirkey low backs with a head rest on mine.That said,the taller seats are probably a little safer.

[Don Kennedy]

Originally Posted by Rob Petrie E395

I can’t remember which one of Bobby Fazios interview videos it was. I think it was car owned by the ex baseball player. His seats look awesome. They looked like they were racing seats. But the upholstery was done in a way that made them look like they belonged in the car. Might try to see who did those. If you want racing seats. But want them to look better in the car.

Eric Bell

[442OLDS]

Originally Posted by Frank Castros

Race seats look ridiculous in classic Stockers. I know I will be bashed for this comment for all the right reasons. So be it.

A few years ago,I joined the race seat club too.
Most will say it is for safety,but the real reason is to get weight out of the car.
Not bashing your comments. You are actually correct.

[4284spd]

Simple question, We all know the west coast is dying in terms of racing venues, why do they still have better car count's than any other division?

[1347]

Originally Posted by 4284spd

Simple question, We all know the west coast is dying in terms of racing venues, why do they still have better car count's than any other division?

I was under the impression that D1 events as a whole got the highest class car counts
We regularly see close to 100 stockers and 75 super stockers at D1 races. This weekend we are at 81 and 61.

[442OLDS]

Originally Posted by 4284spd

Simple question, We all know the west coast is dying in terms of racing venues, why do they still have better car count's than any other division?

I'm thinking Division 3 races definitely have more cars than west coast events?

[Jon Sarrett]

Originally Posted by 442OLDS

I'm thinking Division 3 races definitely have more cars than west coast events?

I agree with that! I've been to several points meets in the last few years where a handful of cars didn't qualify. Indy 2019 points meet stands out, 132 stockers or something like that.