|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 879
Likes: 286
Liked 1,361 Times in 416 Posts
|
![]()
I'm old enough unfortunately to remember before the AHFS . One fast run got you hp. Tuff cookies for the others with that combination. I believe NHRA tried to come up with a system that didn't chase the guy or gal out that didn't have the knowledge or the bank roll to keep up. Making a tweak like throw out the mineshaft races and seeing what happens for a year or two could change things. At least something like that. For example the divisional race at Boise this year in stock had 37 cars. 13 were a second or more under and it went mineshaft. So none of those runs mattered. I would have to research to see how many races went mineshaft. Could be very few. It would be a job at this point to add them in now and look at combination averages. Again just a change to one thing and see what happens. Looking under the hood at least for a second under run isn't the end of the world either.
Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,113 Times in 304 Posts
|
![]()
I am certainly no expert on how the AHFS was intended to "level the field" with so many classes, but wouldn`t it be nice if any car that ran quick enough to cause a HP increase, was at least given a full teardown to ensure that it was indeed legal at the time of the run?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 187
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Disclaimer: I no longer run SS anymore but still like to read all the posts about s/ss. Just my .02
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1,914
Liked 976 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
They dont run fast to the 1/8 and then lift,they just go slow (on 2 barrels or a stop in the linkage etc.) Anyone that has been .850 (.950) under or more during the period should not qualify for supplying any runs slower than that to AFHS
__________________
Stop global whining Last edited by Race Clean; 11-02-2021 at 10:50 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 1,463
Liked 4,388 Times in 504 Posts
|
![]()
Probably easier to just give the bye to however many cars there are above 64. 70 cars means the top 6 cars get a bye. 65 cars means only number 1 gets a bye. No crazy new formulas for an unknown ladder. Would this apply to national events only?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
Liked 503 Times in 131 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 385
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
Even pay the top 5 qualifiers. Make it a little more incentive for it not to be a bracket class. Go back to giving a round point to the number one qualifier as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
|
![]()
I guess there's Stock Eliminator, and then there's Eliminating Stock.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|