|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 80
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
The lower the ratio, the smaller the input sun gear and the weaker the gear set in general The 1.96 that's popular currently is based on the 1.76 carrier seems to live quite well. Many of the other low ratio gear sets are based on the 1.82 carrier and they can be pretty fragile. I've stopped building anything lower than the 1.96.
Jim Mantle V/SA 6632
__________________
Jim Mantle U/V/SA 6632 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
How about the 2.08 gear sets?I have one in my Chevelle wit 5.38's for an overall first gear ratio of 11.19 to 1, and my Chevelle wagon has a set of 5.57's for an overall gear ratio of 11.585. Both cars leave well and you go for a long ride in high gear after the up shift.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
I always ran a 2.08 with a 5.13 in my 67 Camaro small block stocker. Never had any trouble with the trans though the motor never made much more than 400 hp.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|