|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 67
Liked 271 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]()
36lb injectors at 50 psi or 42lb injectors at 40 psi . If I am able to achieve an optimal A/F either way...which will produce more power and greater consistency? Either? My theory is the higher pressure going through the smaller orifice will produce a finer mist..or better atomization which is always better? Or not?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
Has anyone looked at say running the 42 lb injector at say 55 PSI which would have a reduced pulse width / duty cycle verses the 36 lb injector at 50 PSI?
Stan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chatham, ON. Canada
Posts: 19
Likes: 15
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
I run my 24 lbs injectors at 70 psi. Theory is the injector acts larger and high pressure atomizes fuel better. I believe Ed Wright posted on this topic in the past.
Last edited by Pierce Jones; 03-25-2021 at 05:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 382
Likes: 67
Liked 271 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 769
Likes: 75
Liked 534 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
YMMV. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 1,451
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
I've been wondering this also. An oversized injector to get down to a low pulse width duty cycle? This is beneficial if you can phase the injector to spray at optimal time. Or a smaller injector with higher pressure for higher mist and atomization but it stays open longer and could be spraying at a closed valve.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chatham, ON. Canada
Posts: 19
Likes: 15
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Looking at a data log, my injectors (24 lbs/hr) are open 7.7msec (88% duty cycle) at 7000RPM (42 deg/msec). The intake has 308 deg dur @ .020”. So injectors are open 323 degrees of rotation and in my case spraying at a closed intake valve.
Not sure if any would be gained by a 36 lbs/hr etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
One crank rotation @ 7000 RPM is ► 1 / (7000 / 60) = 0.008571 of a second My understanding of Duty Cycle is it is the percent of open time against 2 crank rotations (720 degrees). 1) @ 7000 RPM @ 7.7 Mill seconds pulse width I get 44.9% Duty Cycle 2) @ 7000 RPM @ 88% Duty Cycle I get 15.0857 Mill seconds pulse width I don't know what your engine BSFC or HP is. But a 24lb injector running at its rated PSI, if I guess .45 BSFC and 375 HP, that would 2# above. Stan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|