|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 879
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]()
Not surprising at all. Any sponsor is expecting to get some sort of "return" for an investment. The "return" in the case for Mello Yello has completely changed since their negotiations started. First, their are not the thousands of fans at the races to enjoy a cold Mello Yello, enjoy the mock up race car and test your starting line reflexes, be surrounded by Mello Yello advertising, and see their favorite driver drink a Mello Yello.
Remember, Mello Yello has been title sponsor for "Pro" cars and not us sportsman racers. Like him or not, John Force chose not to race this season. He is THE draw to get fans, period. I believe he is probably not getting his sponsor's support for the same reason as NHRA. It will be impossible to get another similar title sponsor. NHRA has nothing to offer a consumer goods company....no fans, no John Force, and huge financial payouts. Their best opportunity for sponsorship of Pro racing is something like a .com company that advertises simply for awareness. I believe that the best opportunity for successful survival of NHRA is a sort of hybrid race. Other than US Nationals and Winternationals, which could have a full field of fuel cars, all other National events would be a "match" race type of deal. "John Force vs Schumacher" in best 2 out of 3.....Same deal with Top Fuel. The fans would still get their "taste" for fuel cars, while payoffs and insurance costs should be greatly reduced. Then, continue to develop the factory cars, move existing older stockers and superstockers into "Nostalgia" with ALL of the same existing rules. Cars 2008 and newer would run existing Stock and Superstock classes. Oh, and bring back Modified Production with restrictions. Swing away folks. If you wonder how I know about advertising/sponsorship value......I retired from Coca-Cola after nearly 40 years in Management and Marketing.
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 Last edited by SStockDart; 09-21-2020 at 03:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 123
Likes: 735
Liked 62 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
I can't see how NHRA wins this, not to mention the harm they are doing in attracting future sponsors.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 63
Liked 207 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe there will be more Sportsnationals next year or no quotas for sportsman classes if they have any nationals next year
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 192
Likes: 3
Liked 186 Times in 57 Posts
|
![]()
The part that states with no fans ( and the Stock & Super Stock Racers they ran off ) along with all their employees ,indicates a need to cut cost ,but in the next statement they are financially Strong ! When your one of your biggest sponsors backs out what else could you say but we are financially strong to keep the other sponsors from backing out also ! The old saying is when the tide goes out you can see who is swimming naked !
__________________
John Ancona 717 STK / SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 351
Likes: 499
Liked 295 Times in 111 Posts
|
![]()
Effective immediately, I presume? So what will this do to last week's 'good' news of signing FoxSports to multi-year deal to broadcast. Again, at cost, I presume. Another 2020 Kick in the Teeth! Ouch!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA states Coke as a family member , then file a lawsuit. You nhra changed what Coke was to receive for their money. Covid changed your schedule. Coke should not be held responsible for fulfilling their obligation. You did not fulfill yours. You reduced purses, how about your salary and others up top in ivory tower. We are family and everyone should suffer together.
Last edited by Jeff Stout; 09-21-2020 at 06:49 PM. Reason: More |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Wonder who has the best lawyers?
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 3,601
Liked 7,780 Times in 1,743 Posts
|
![]()
Probably the people with the most money to spend.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,162
Liked 1,885 Times in 578 Posts
|
![]()
yep, just like family....
__________________
KEITH MAYERS 2-1/2 X somebody Still many X nobody |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 879
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
When TV agreements get involved with a contract, the network very likely requires a minimum advertising investment. An example would be.......NBC will pay you a million dollars if you guarantee NBC 2 million in ad revenue (or pick a number). This recent deal with FOX agreement seems a little suspicious to me. Hope it all works out.
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|