|
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
I think you are try to slow your car down so you don,t get HP. But how big is big and how small is small.I once torn down down by Wayne Lewis and was told my carb was to small, that all that was said. You do not have a problem if your camber cc are to big or your runners are to small. Merry Christmas To all. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green Creek (Tryon) North Carolina
Posts: 331
Likes: 69
Liked 99 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
I would think if your if your Stocker had unaltered intake or exhaust runners that CC'ed less than spec., or combustion chambers that CC'ed larger than spec it's obvious you are not grinding and bead blasting or using acid on your heads. I would also think if your carb had the right unaltered part number on it and measured smaller than spec. It left the factory that way. With either scenario IMHO it's obvious no one is trying to cheat. Correct me if I'm wrong but you are not required to run the factory lift on the camshaft in Stock, you just can't exceed it. If a Super Stock cylinder head guru finds out by putting epoxy and brass in the right places and making the runners smaller the car gets faster. If they hold less CC volume that spec. will the head get tossed. Just curious, Don Jackson
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
The key as my brother wrote is there is a plus and minus number for the carb. Cam lift only plus would be bad. BP
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,647
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,753 Times in 2,236 Posts
|
![]()
Both are out. I think
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
Likes: 299
Liked 42 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 615
Likes: 17
Liked 920 Times in 259 Posts
|
![]()
"plus .005 or minus .015", and "max" or "min" size, CCs, CI, lift or whatever are 2 different specs.
Numbers can be counterfeited and parts can be machined/modified. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Billy, I'm surprised at you. Surely you know that the reason specs became so important is because people were mucking with "correct part number" parts.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#18 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,778 Times in 1,742 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Now, sorry for getting long-winded but the reason I wrote this is I was having a conversation with another acquaintance of mine yesterday and one of MY combos came up. Now, said combo will run MUCH better with a smaller carb on it but the original, correct numbers carb (I have it) is a big carb. The problem is that the NHRA throttle bore and venturi spec are for the small carb. Do I run the "correct" carb or do I run the "in-correct" carb with the smaller specs? If I use the "correct" # carb, I take the chance of being tossed for too big a carb. If I run the "correct" spec carb, I take the chance of being tossed for too small a carb. In a situation where the guide contradicts itself, I really am not sure just how the chips might fall. Now when you're thinking of the correct answer remember, I'm the guy who was tossed at Indy once because my heads looked "too stock".
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sedalia, Mo
Posts: 438
Likes: 331
Liked 317 Times in 62 Posts
|
![]()
Billy, I don't see how you could have a problem if your carb meets NHRA specs. But you really should be discussing this with NHRA.
__________________
Bob Shaw V/SA 515 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 56
Liked 165 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Billy Nees;604497]To answer your question Garrett, no that exact scenario has never happened to my knowledge. BUT, a close acquaintance of mine was at a Divisional race a couple of years ago and was "spot" checked. The Tech Man wanted to see his carb and he complied. The carb on his combo was the ONLY number listed for his combo and (in fact) was the original carb for the car. Tech Man measures carb, carb comes up WAY (WAY WAY) too small, Tech Man wants to know why his carb is so small. When acquaintance tells Tech Man that it is the original and correct carb, the Tech Man doesn't toss him but tells him not to come to another race with THAT carb on the car.
Now, sorry for getting long-winded but the reason I wrote this is I was having a conversation with another acquaintance of mine yesterday and one of MY combos came up. Now, said combo will run MUCH better with a smaller carb on it but the original, correct numbers carb (I have it) is a big carb. The problem is that the NHRA throttle bore and venturi spec are for the small carb. Do I run the "correct" carb or do I run the "in-correct" carb with the smaller specs? If I use the "correct" # carb, I take the chance of being tossed for too big a carb. If I run the "correct" spec carb, I take the chance of being tossed for too small a carb. In a situation where the guide contradicts itself, I really am not sure just how the chips might fall. Now when you're thinking of the correct answer remember, I'm the guy who was tossed at Indy once because my heads looked "too stock".[/QUOTE run the carb that the spec calls for in the nhra specifications guide ,, if you have information that can prove the correct carb along with throttle bore and venturi ,contact nhra tech official and plead your case have both carbs on hand at your next divisional race and let them decide I also haven't seen any +/- spec on carb bores or venturi's Last edited by gmonde; 12-23-2019 at 08:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|