|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
318-2bbl, think I can get 300hp out of it, has it been done? I like the idea. Would put me in N-O or P depending on weight of course.
Mike Last edited by Coleydog; 12-24-2018 at 07:43 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
79-81 231 V6, in a G-body? More cam than 82-up, bigger valves than a 78, but mixed opinions on a dualjet? Is a 1 1/2" primary header too big?
__________________
Joe Toller Lewistown, MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
The boosters in a Dual -Jet are part of the bowl casting, like a Q-Jet. That's your main problem ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
|
![]()
Never saw any in N, O ,P . I've seen them in Q,R.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,803
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
We run N O P with 318 Thermoquad @ 230 HP.
We tried 2 Brl. although did not change anything else in engine. The wagon went from 1+ under to not being able to run the index. The Thermoquad is a great carb if you take the time to understand it!
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
soooo, what do you guys think about a 70 Hornet with a 232/ stick combo? I seem to have one that's just begging for SOMEBODY to build....it might have to be ne...
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
While it seems that would be good because of the 2-bbl carb, the '77 or '79 258 2-bbl makes more sense for only 5 more hp. they have 26 more cubic inches, bigger cam, better cylinder heads. Ed Fernandez and Jim Mantle have proven them as automatic combos.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,777 Times in 1,742 Posts
|
![]()
Well, the newer 258s are better but if you have a 70 Hornet, I would say go for it! If you compare it to my 70 Chevy 230/140/140, everything is as good or better and I'm stuck with a 1bbl. and it ran pretty good.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|