|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
-Ford 5.4 331 cu inches at NHRA maximum specs will be 342 cu inches
-Chevrolet 350 cu inches at NHRA maximum specs will be 370 cu inches -Mopar 354 cu inches at NHRA maximum specs will be 374 cu inches Now coming into play, adding another 2 atmospheres of air with the use of a supercharger at approximately 26 psi boost. Ford 5.4 NHRA max specs 342 cu in with 2 atmospheres of air is 1026 cu inches Chevrolet 350 NHRA max specs 370 cu in with 2 atmospheres of air is 1110 cu inches Mopar 354 NHRA max specs 374 cu in with 2 atmospheres of air is 1122 cu inches So under boost Chevrolet is 84 more cubic inches and the Mopar is 96 more cubic inches than the Ford engine combination. The 2.9L front entry Supercharger spinning to 9,000 engine RPM will produce 26 psi boost in both the GM and Mopar. The 4.0L Supercharger with the 4.00” pulley on it at 9,000 engine RPM will produce 24 psi boost on the Ford 5.4L motor. Some say the Ford has a better flowing set of heads which is true but we are limited with camshaft lift. Which the 500 and 510 HP combination only have a .471 max lift cams. GM and Mopar are well over .640 max lift cam specs, which allows there heads to flow more. HELLO! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,667
Liked 2,643 Times in 441 Posts
|
![]()
Jim, great posts; pretty much what you and I discussed at the Dutch Classic.
__________________
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, CT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Took a lot of email, phone calls and discussions with NHRA to get the old combinations approved to run in Stock after the new lbs/hp breakdowns emerged. NHRA was very receptive on several requests(others not so much :-) )
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
NHRA has been very accepting, respectful, helpful, and in fact they even pointed out to Ford that this combination is legal for stock. They are as well a bit confused as to Ford's response. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
I’ll admit I was getting nervous every time they(NHRA) said the guide would be in a particular date 2x and those dates came and went. I was simply just trying to get a more competitive engine combo for the shoot-out without having to build another car. Heck this one took me 4yrs to build. Lol. But the NHRA certainly has been great to deal with.
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This eats away at me every day. NHRA was going to accept two different platforms from Ford to be able to keep the 08,10, and 12 Cobra Jets competitive in the shootout. It's tough on the people who invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in their Cobra Jet's and Ford won't help their own racers to keep them competitive. I went right to the top with this to Dave Pericak. He basically told me that Mike was in charge. Which scares the hell out of me! He personally sent emails out to the older Cobra Jet owners and said he would help those who wanted to race the shoot out class. Then when NHRA approved it his response to NHRA was that Ford is not interested! It was a stiff kick in the face... When Mike demanded the 500 and 510 HP combination be deleted from the shoot out engine combination NHRA had no choice but to delete it because Mike represents Ford Motor Company. It was on the books for just over a week and Cobra Jet owners had already spent a ten's of thousands of their hard earned money to build that combination and Mike knew this. A couple of years ago at the PRI show I was standing with a group of Ford Racers at the Ford booth when Mike made a comment about how he extremely disliked the Cobra Jet program. After that Ford released Mike from his previous program, then Dave later put him in charge of the Cobra Jet program...? This does not work for the guys who have been supporting the Ford name since the beginning when they purchased their 2008,2010, and 2012 Cobra Jet's. Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Jim,
I have no personal dealing with Mike so I can not speak on that front. While talking with Don Fezell at his shop in PA when I was buying his stick stuff from him for my CJ he stated items that he had requested that NHRA/Ford said no to. When I was speaking with NHRA I also was requesting items for my combo and even the TVS cars to make the class more competitive amoungst the combos I was told a similar item for the 08s. My request for the TVS was weight, pulley change(Don said what he ran in testing) or blower. I was also turned down on some service replacement parts accepted for my combo as well.(Believe someone else was behind that one) I can’t blame Ford for wanting their latest and greatest to be limited to the car owners. It keeps the guys who can afford to have 4,5,6,7 of these cars keep buying new ones. Plus it showcases what Ford currently offers. Brand loyal racers will generally remain brand loyal regardless. As time marches on architectures become obsolete. It’s a tough pill to swallow though when you have $250k in a car that before was going to require you to build a whole new one. (With the current rules it will still cost $55-65K to switch architectures. Same would bring it down to $10-25k reusing most parts.
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 45
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
How do curtain areas compare between the Ford, Mopar, and GM with each at max lift?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Crete, IL
Posts: 167
Likes: 265
Liked 54 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If I calculated right. Chevy with .641 lift = 4.349 sq.in Int / 3.185 Ex Mopar with .591/.589 lift = 3.891 sq.in Int / 3.008 Ex Ford 5.4 with .473 lift = 4.255 sq.in Int / 3.682 Ex The 4 smaller valves of the Ford increases the curtain area at a lower lift vs. a 2 valve with greater lift.
__________________
Todd Gross 3323 FS/E,F Last edited by Todd Gross; 11-12-2017 at 01:40 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|