HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2016, 06:40 PM   #1
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

I've been trying to figure out for years why NHRA requires the master switch to be on the positive cable. It should be on the negative cable. It would be much safer and easier. No battery ground and everything will be killed. Somebody please explain to me why I'm wrong.
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com

Last edited by Darrel Goheen; 12-09-2016 at 06:42 PM.
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 07:53 PM   #2
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
I've been trying to figure out for years why NHRA requires the master switch to be on the positive cable. It should be on the negative cable. It would be much safer and easier. No battery ground and everything will be killed. Somebody please explain to me why I'm wrong.
Hi
If there is an accident and the positive and negative crushed would still have a short and you have not addressed the issue of protecting both the front and rear batteries............
If wanted you could control the front battery with a constant duty rely.......
Sorry I hijacked thisthread....

Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 10:53 PM   #3
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
Hi
If there is an accident and the positive and negative crushed would still have a short and you have not addressed the issue of protecting both the front and rear batteries............
If wanted you could control the front battery with a constant duty rely.......
Sorry I hijacked thisthread....

Bob
That is correct Bob. For safety reasons I don't think a front and rear battery should be allowed. Also why is a cut off switch only required for rear mounted batteries?
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 12:55 PM   #4
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
That is correct Bob. For safety reasons I don't think a front and rear battery should be allowed. Also why is a cut off switch only required for rear mounted batteries?

Hi,

They should allow a maximum of 2 batteries and allow them to be located in the trunk for safety reasons, much the same that was done to allow..............

Front disc brakes......
Aluminum seats..........
Roller rocker arms....
Solid rear axles in IRS cars.......
Aftermarket rods, pistons and valve train.....
Full cages that extend through the firewall.........
I am still trying to figure out the safety advantage of an aluminum radiator...

I could go on and on about the STOCK rule changes for safety, but I will stop now..........

Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 01:28 PM   #5
junior barns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Sorry on hijacking this thread but when did NHRA allow aluminum radiators as replacement? I have been out of racing for a while!
junior barns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 02:35 PM   #6
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 667
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Wink Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by junior barns View Post
Sorry on hijacking this thread but when did NHRA allow aluminum radiators as replacement? I have been out of racing for a while!
Yup, for about two years now. Jim

.
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion
1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 01:34 PM   #7
Tony Goodman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Zeeland, MI
Posts: 98
Likes: 135
Liked 18 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

The Safety people at the track would know that all door cars have their battterys in the back and controlled by the master cutoff switch.

Last edited by Tony Goodman; 12-10-2016 at 04:29 PM.
Tony Goodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.