|
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
They have been fueling Pro Stock cars at the back of the lanes for years.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 531
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
Yes they have ED BUT is it the same fuel everybody else is getting or that "special blend" only for the Pro's this time around--- VP has never ever had problems ---but Sunoco sure cannot say that ---FED 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 531
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
yes the "same" but is it really the same or is it SR-18 the street version???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
The word around the pits is Sunoco wants NHRA to change to a specific gravity test instead of the dielectric test that NHRA has been doing for years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
That would open up cheating gas for sure. Many years ago it was gravity tested only and became very easy to alter fuel and get it back to the proper specifics for the brand being claimed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 531
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
Fine but if the gas is still garbage REGARDLESS of what testing standard they use how is this going to help???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe Sunoco only bought one year. So many hate that stuff, I can not imagine them selling enough to come out too far ahead on the money end.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 16
Liked 79 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
In 1964, Dr. Dean Hill and Dale Schaffer started using a dialectic meter to check the gasoline. They quit using a hydrometer because they needed something more reliable that would catch people altering the fuel. The dialectic meter is still used today. We have a new meter that came out in the late 1990's that checks to the hundredths rather than the tenths like the old meter did. The new meter has a longer battery life and is easier to use. I was told by a Sunoco rep that they use the hydrometer to check the octane level to make sure that it is as advertised. NHRA does not check the octane levels. They only check to see if the fuel has been altered from the original manufacturers spec. We also have a chemical test we use. The dialectic meter also will indicate when the fuel is getting old or flat. Most all racers ask to see where their fuel is in reference to the chart. This gives them an indication as to if they need to freshen their fuel or put new fuel in the car. At fuel check, for me this is more to help the racer keep his fuel in line rather than catch someone cheating. I can tell when the fuel has been mixed or something has been added to it. It takes years to learn how to do this. I have taught an NHRA Fuel Check School for the last several years. This is for NHRA employees as well as I have also taught several foreign track managers and foreign fuel check people from other countries. This post was not approved by NHRA. Hope this helps.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|