|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods Mi
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Did not really see the rationale behind lowering them in the first place.
Bob ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I think it would be great if dedicated Superstockers weren't bumped out of their own class by traveling pro's with their stockers because they are bumped out of their own class as a result of NHRA eliminating their own category for that particular event. More so if NHRA cuts to 64 car fields as a maximum for any / all events once the pro side of NHRA takes affect.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff how many traveling pros are there? That is a non issue. 64 car field, that is not going to happen either. If stock and super stock is going to get cut for a time basis, it will in the number of time trials.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I think you are right about the 64 car fields.Thats not going to happen.32 might be more like it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA will still need the filler
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 989
Likes: 35
Liked 317 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
The new filler is already in the experimental stages at Divisionals. T/S & T/D. Or if you race at the Pomona events it is called Super Pro & Pro, I believe.
But do not worry, soon you will only be at Sportsnationals. Be thankful that they do not use lie detectors instead of Tech, the fields would then be down to 16, at -.40 under. See, people complain, and NHRA has responded. Ron Ortiz U/SA
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And I sure hope your wrong about the number of qualifying runs! Because your talking about going down to 1 in some instances!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
There certainly is not a lack of potential filler.Top Sportsman,Top Dragster,Top Super Stock,Top Stock,Top Snowmobile,Top Motorhome.Top Pit Bike.The list could go on and on.
Last edited by Speedracer; 11-20-2007 at 03:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]()
I've seen some of those Top Motorhomes is secret testing, they do some pretty impressive wheelstands...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|