Wagon Train

[Bruce Noland]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

There are at least 3 obvious facts to this scam:

1.) New car manufacturers are producing factory built race cars with intentionally under rated horsepower factors.
2.) nhra is knowingly accepting under rated factory race cars and placing them in Stock and Super Stock.
3.) Owners knowingly buying under rated factory race cars to race them in Stock and Super Stock.

All three of these facts must be in place before this scam could be foisted upon the categories of Stock and Super Stock. For the buyers of these under factored cars to say don't blame us, we are just taking advantage of what this scam has to offer is disingenious at best. Without the buyers/owners this debacle would not be possible. Have a great season guys.

Fact:
noun
1. something that actually exists; reality; truth
2. something known to exist or to have happened
3. a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true

[Brett C]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

Fact:
noun
1. something that actually exists; reality; truth
2. something known to exist or to have happened
3. a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true

Yes it is a fact that you have expressed your opinion.

[Bruce Noland]

Originally Posted by Brett C

Yes it is a fact that the information you posted is your opinion.

Yes, and the earth is flat and only 5,000 years old. Having a little fun are ye? In order for any of these three facts to be merely opinions you must be able to disprove them. Otherwise they remain facts and your opinion about opinions is debunked.

[Brett C]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

Yes, and the earth is flat and only 5,000 years old. Having a little fun are ye? In order for any of these three facts to be merely opinions you must be able to disprove them. Otherwise they remain facts and your opinion about opinions is debunked.

In fact, opinions are opinions until proven to be fact. Debunked.

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by Brett C

In fact, opinions are opinions until proven to be fact. Debunked.

Bret, with all due respect, I still don't understand what I posted that was simply opinion, not fact? That a Stocker that happens to be the fastest car in a Super Stock class must be extremely under factored? Is that it?

I know you don't like me, easy enough to tell when I try to talk to you at the track.
I don't dislike you, just your hp factors. Those aren't your doing.

[Brett C]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Bret, with all due respect, I still don't understand what I posted that was simply opinion, not fact? That a Stocker that happens to be the fastest car in a Super Stock class must be extremely under factored? Is that it?

I know you don't like me, easy enough to tell when I try to talk to you at the track.
I don't dislike you, just your hp factors. Those aren't your doing.

Mr Wright,
This has absolutely nothing to do with whether I like someone or not. For the record, you have never approached me to have conversation at the track. They are noy MY hp factors, they are the sanctioning bodies'. And my comments were all generalities.
My participation in this is now over since it has now sadly reached the point that people are talking about not liking other people. It is quite disappointing that what should be a community of fellowship in racers turns itself into heated debates over what we all love to do. Sad.

[Ed Wright]

Originally Posted by Brett C

Mr Wright,
This has absolutely nothing to do with whether I like someone or not. For the record, you have never approached me to have conversation at the track. They are noy MY hp factors, they are the sanctioning bodies'. And my comments were all generalities.
My participation in this is now over since it has now sadly reached the point that people are talking about not liking other people. It is quite disappointing that what should be a community of fellowship in racers turns itself into heated debates over what we all love to do. Sad.

Sorry. I thought you were the gentleman that drives the white Mustang. My ignorance.

[Bruce Noland]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Bret, with all due respect, I still don't understand what I posted that was simply opinion, not fact? That a Stocker that happens to be the fastest car in a Super Stock class must be extremely under factored? Is that it?

I know you don't like me, easy enough to tell when I try to talk to you at the track.
I don't dislike you, just your hp factors. Those aren't your doing.

Ed,
Bret has nothing to offer this debate. He's just clowning around cuz he has no facts and wishes to be a pest. Its fun to read his posts. Don't take him seriously.

[Joseph Teuton]

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland

Ed,
Bret has nothing to offer this debate. He's just clowning around cuz he has no facts and wishes to be a pest. Its fun to read his posts. Don't take him seriously.

Bruce do you run SS? Because the men you are chatting with both do. So i would have to say that yea Bret has a lot to offer to the debate. I also believe that years of racing would imply that he has some fact to what he is saying. Now I know not everyone has been racing since day 1 like some of you but hey whos counting years at this point.

[Greg Hill]

There is one undeniable fact. Every one of the hp ratings on these new cars was bogus starting out. The only other hp ratings that were that bogus to start with were the Lt1's and the LS1's in stock. Anybody that has half a brain can look at the specs on these motors and see how bogus they are compared to the competition. I'll give you one example. Charlie I'm not picking on you, but the 4.6 l Mustang GT was rated at 300 hp SAE net. The Cobra Jet version was rated at 235 with more of everything than the street car.

When the manufacturers went from gross hp ratings in 1971 to net hp ratings in1972 NHRA factored all those motors 1972 and up before they hit the race track. Al Provoast told me his wagon went from 185 to 285 before he ever went down the track. The motor I run in my car is a 71 350 Z28 motor that was rated at 330 from the factory and is now rated at 315. The same exact motor in 1972 was factory rated at 255. In those days NHRA did their job. The first time they didn't was the 94 Chevy LT1 which was rated at 275 net and allowed to run at that hp rating, and is now at 346.

My point in this rant is that the factory race cars were rated below their equivalent street car ratings that were SAE net to start with and they had more compression, more cam, bigger throttle bodies and better manifolds. All of you guys that complained about all of us crying about the hp ratings, well guess what? We were right on the money.