|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
A positive side effect of a change like that would be car counts going up because there are a lot of small time guys that don't go to Nast because of fast cars tear downs and the other assorted bs that nhra throws at the sportsman racer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Why not just give everybody a trophy too?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What does nhra offer someone for setting a record? you get a horse power hit and bragging rights?I'll take the trophy thanks
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Just because somebody spanks you in a heads up doesn't mean they have a $100.000.00 car. Could be they know more and work harder. Sounds like et brackets are more your speed.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I only have a bracket car ed. That said the number of heads up races in eliminations that are 11.44 to 11.46 are uncommon and that's not a theory read the internet. They are usually 10.55 to a 10.79 and the 10.79 guy usually cuts a .005 and the other guy is .123 . Everything besides the pros and comp is a bracket race anyway so why should with an under factored car get a gift rd? What kind of car you got ed?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I have an old '96 Pontiac Trans Am. SS/JA. It ain 't fancy. My heads ups have all been a couple hundredths. Last two have had MOV of 6" and 12".
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 12-06-2013 at 12:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Have you run one of these guys I am referring to or have they not invaded j yet? How do you even know what those guys can run w so many 1000 ft qualifying runs?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
My car may not get out much but take away heads up and it would never come back out as a class car. And this from a guy that runs a well populated class with a car that will get smoked in the majority of heads up. So it would be to my advantage to get rid of them. I have nothing against bracket racing did a lot of it and probably will again some day. You have said you don't have a class car so why are you here suggesting we change the rules in a class you don't run. I have yet to see a class racer in the bracket form telling them they need to change the rules. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Why do people feel NHRA is "out to get them" or are trying to push racers out just because it allows new cars to compete? Do you have a TV with rabbit ears, or a carb on your street car (okay, don't answer that), or any old technology for daily life? Do you have a smart phone? I'll tell you why, because the rules don't suit them, that's why and people feel the NHRA should exist for their own personal purpose.
It's called evolution people. There isn't one other class in NHRA where you can be competitive with old equipment. Okay, so one guy wins here and there with no throttle stop in Super Street, but you don't see cars from the '80s and '90s winning in the .90 classes. Why should it be a "right" to be competitive with an old race car when there is new, better technology available? Should NHRA ignore the new cars? Well then you'd have a nostalgia series, at least until everyone got old and quit racing, then you'd have nothing. Racers get out of the sport for many reasons and I'm sure some decided they didn't want to compete against new cars, but to make a blanket statement that a mass of racers were pushed out is just not factual. And, for all who've quit, there are many new racers. Please keep in mind that I love muscle cars from the 60s and 70s and I would love to see them continue on. I also own a 20-year old Stocker and I know it's day in the sun has passed. It's competitive, but who cares about that? It's my choice to update or be content racing a car that is outdated. Everyone else has the same choice.
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 535 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Evan Smith;411445]Why should it be a "right" to be competitive with an old race car when there is new, better technology available?
Evan: First of all, not everyone can afford a $100,000+ race car. Stock Eliminator wasn't intended to be "he with the most money wins"...it's not NMCA heads-up racing. The "better technology" argument doesn't fly. Why has the NHRA accepted the bogus HP factors that the new cars came with from the get-go? How come the AHFS has worked at a "snail's pace" when it comes to these new cars? The answer to all of these questions is because the NHRA has simply let them. They are catering to big money.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|