|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 629
Liked 1,968 Times in 595 Posts
|
![]()
I have run both and a stick is much more expensive and labor intensive to race. The fun factor for a stick is way high and makes up for some of that. If you are competitive and want to go rounds you are better off with the auto. There are a select few stick racers that go many rounds but they are fewer and farther between than autos.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan City IN
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alex Denysenko NHRA 3038 SS, 3305 STK - IHRA 6 SS, 330A STK Moneymaker Racing LaPorte Indiana 219-861-1214 www.moneymakerracing.net |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Stick cars ARE WAY more fun, if your young enough to enjoy the maint. I typically have my converter & Trans looked at every two years. Can't see how that costs more to run than a stick.
Some stick racers make a lot bigger deal out of what they are doing than is real, but I guess it makes them feel good. LOL I have a lot more stick passes under my (way too long :-) ) belt than in an auto, it ain't that big a deal to drive one. I made a pass in a friend's stick car a few years ago, one pass. About 5 Hun slower than he ran that day, and according to his play back tach hit the shifts pretty close. Surprised us both. They now sure shift easier than I remembered. I am not in any physical shape, nor any longer interested in the maintenance.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|