|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 503
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
In all sincereity, I was just trying to help and have a little fun. Seems like you were preaching to the choir, everybody heard you, but know body was believing.
You go out of your way to prepare people for the inevitable and ................... Anyway have a safe trip, see you in Indy....Oh am I still allowed to visit the compound for refreshment and fellowship?? RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
RJ, you are always welcome. Your unique outlook on life is too good to let go by, and of course there are the beverages.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 147
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
I think I have some credibility in this, all of the "exception vehicles" DP, CJ, and COPO in Stock had to be submitted and approved by NHRA with a complete and full list of components. The 11 V10 DP was built and spec'd with the 9", hence only the 11 DP can use this assembly. The same as with all of the unique components on this car. These exception vehicles have a unique component spec sheet that applies to that vehicle only.
MPR is correct in that the 09 and 10 DP did not come with a solid rear axle but the solid axle conversion had to be approved prior to its release. The then current approved rear axles were allowed, 8 3/4, Dana 60, 9 1/4.
__________________
John Donato Stk / SS 3435 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|