HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2013, 07:45 PM   #41
MikeFicacci
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Some hooked and some spun. The track was not perfect but adequate. I for one thought the Gary Richard/Holbrook pedal-fest was awesome. Can't agree with Stock being called for Q2 while guys are still getting fuel check. We just skipped Q2.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010
MikeFicacci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2013, 08:31 PM   #42
Bill Hawk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: manassas va
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Barton View Post
To make my experience even worse, I had to race Biondo heads up in the 2nd round of the Eliminator and probably would have won if I didn't spin. I'm usually not a sore loser but when it's due to the lack of track prep I fealt I was ripped off. Half of the reason I spun is because I removed all of the ballast from the car to run and support the Factory Showdown. I added my regular weight for the bracket race but needed to remove it again to race Sal.

David, with all due respect your comment about probably beating Sal is a little premature. The starting line was terrible, but our car has only spun once since is was built. It spun against Gary Richard in the final of the Shootout, we tried to step it up and the track could not handle it.

The track was bad like I said, but against you we added weight and adjusted for the poor traction. Something maybe you should have thought of. There was no way we were going to give it all we had in those conditions. You have a legitimate gripe, but my issue with you is thinking you could out run Sal and blame the track for the loss. Blaming the track for spinning is legitimate, the loss is a stretch.

You showed no performance advantage all week. You may have been saving it for when you needed it, but given the track conditions we were not setup to let it all hang out at this race.
__________________
Bill Hawk 1352 STK
Bill Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:44 AM   #43
John DiBartolomeo
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Beaver Springs, PA
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
Liked 1,282 Times in 159 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

I think I have to agree with Jack... Bob Lang would have to be crazy (no comments here) to come on here and answer questions. But I can guarantee he's listening. The week before the Maple Grove divisional, members of the super category SRAC had a meeting to discuss some issues, most notably track prep. Bob Lang was invited and gladly attended to rationally (key word here) discuss our concerns. He was more than willing to listen and accept some of our "suggestions." At the 'Grove, if anyone was paying attention, you would have noticed a marked difference in how the track was prepped, both before racing began and in between sessions. With Lang in charge of track prep at the nat events, that same scenario took place at E-Town. I'm not going to defend the poor starting line there, nor the crazy schedule but expecting to run two classes back to back with those cars shocking the tires in roughly the same place on a track that had temps well above 100-degrees, was probably a mistake. Something I think they (whoever "they" is at NHRA) would agree.

VP vs. VHT (which is really now PJ1)? Nat events use PJ1 (VHT). I don't know what they use on a weekly basis at E-Town or at a lot of other tracks, but the bottom line that both work well in most cases. My thoughts have always been that we spray too much and don't drag enough. Cars have to stick to rubber and the spray is only there to facilitate the rubber sticking to it.

Here's my point: If you think they're not listening, you're drastically mistaken. In regards to the track prep, trying to prep the track for different types of cars can drive anyone to drink. Trying to find that happy medium would probably have most of us popping open the Jim Beam a lot quicker than NHRA would.
__________________
John DiBartolomeo
DRC Race Products
DragRacingActionOnline.com
John DiBartolomeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:26 AM   #44
1320racer
VIP Member
 
1320racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Quote:
Originally Posted by John DiBartolomeo View Post
I think I have to agree with Jack... Bob Lang would have to be crazy (no comments here) to come on here and answer questions. But I can guarantee he's listening.
Maybe he's reading but listening has yet to be proven and since you can "guarantee it, do tell us how you KNOW!

Quote:
With Lang in charge of track prep at the nat events, that same scenario took place at E-Town. I'm not going to defend the poor starting line there, nor the crazy schedule but expecting to run two classes back to back with those cars shocking the tires in roughly the same place on a track that had temps well above 100-degrees, was probably a mistake. Something I think they (whoever "they" is at NHRA) would agree.
Sure sounds like you ARE defending the deplorable starting line.

Quote:
Here's my point: If you think they're not listening, you're drastically mistaken.
that has not been proven in the past or now!

Quote:
In regards to the track prep, trying to prep the track for different types of cars can drive anyone to drink.
Again, sure sounds like you ARE defending the deplorable track conditions!
1320racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:36 AM   #45
MikeFicacci
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Not trying to be a pain, just asking a question here, but is it NHRA's job to make sure that every single car hooks, especially when set up on kill? The V10 Dodge's made enough smoke at the Atco Open to shoo away the bugs.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010
MikeFicacci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:38 AM   #46
Randall Klein
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

I'm sure Lang won't get into a discussion on i-sites, as NHRA has a leash on social dialogues where the company line (or silence) can't be legal-proofed....it sure looks like they came down on Travis at one time, who now uses a disclosure

That said, it would be helpful if ND would just address what most of us believe, that is National Event track conditions are set up for wheel speed not dead hook...just confirm it and let the hi-HP sportsmen classes adjust chassis, low end power for that contingency

Since I believe NHRA will not listen to SRAC, board chatter or start line histronics, if I owned a new factory hot rod, taming 800-1000 HP on 9" tires, after spending $100K with one of the big 3 mfgs, I would ask those mfgs with their supposed clout to address this with NHRA.....how do they want their brands to come across to spectators, or heaven forbid, their customers

This is assuming they care after the sale

Since many believe Ford has lined NHRA pockets to acheive some unknown corporate stock-enhancement with their shareholders, and, it seems, the Ford flagship drivers are unhappy, go to Ford racing (or Mopar or GM) and ask them to intervene....do they want their corporate image looking like a tire-frying street junkie or a high flying wheels up balls-to-the-wall 21st century factory hot rod

Finally, it sure looks like NHRA is sending many signals that National Events are not for S/SS racers....if you attend, I think you must plan on the worst (parking, schedule, track prep, cancellation, no empathy)
Randall Klein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:44 AM   #47
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,446
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

We should run class in the driveway/front yard of whatever a**hole sued to get this despicable 10:00 - 6:00 curfew. Airplanes are ok but race cars are not, one weekend a year? They are probably in the Hamptons or Belmar this weekend anyway..

That schedule was ridiculous from the start, which is why I started a thread about it 5 days before the race. Factory radiators aren't going to cool a stocker much in 90 degree heat for 6 rounds in a row. Then super stock was herded like cattle for two runs in 30 minutes at the end of the day and screwed out of our third run.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 02:36 PM   #48
Byron Worner
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 229
Likes: 11
Liked 28 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Thursday schedule was horrible along with the track prep. I had no troubles but there were A LOTTTTTTT of races decided by the poor track prep.
Byron Worner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 02:54 PM   #49
David Barton
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Hawk View Post
David, with all due respect your comment about probably beating Sal is a little premature. The starting line was terrible, but our car has only spun once since is was built. It spun against Gary Richard in the final of the Shootout, we tried to step it up and the track could not handle it.

The track was bad like I said, but against you we added weight and adjusted for the poor traction. Something maybe you should have thought of. There was no way we were going to give it all we had in those conditions. You have a legitimate gripe, but my issue with you is thinking you could out run Sal and blame the track for the loss. Blaming the track for spinning is legitimate, the loss is a stretch.

You showed no performance advantage all week. You may have been saving it for when you needed it, but given the track conditions we were not setup to let it all hang out at this race.
Bill, I'm not looking to pick a fight. You seem to be a little defensive for me stating I thought I had a chance if I had some rubber. You guys won fair and square and I applaud you for that. The bottom line is NHRA did not prep the track to the best of their ability. I really believe if they would drag it more often there would have been less problems.

Mike, I don't even know what to say about your pedal fest comment. That race was far from awesome. I thought it was really sad that Gary Richard, a guy that has provided NHRA with millions of dollars, wasn't provided the track surface he deserves. Same goes for anyone who paid their entry fee.
David Barton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 03:41 PM   #50
Bill Hawk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: manassas va
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Is Bob Lang

David,

I didn't think you were picking a fight or trying to. You said probably, and now you say you thought you had a chance, that's a big difference. I would have never posted if you said thought instead of probably. The track was bad we all agree, lets just leave it at that. You have more issues to deal with, so I will say no more about it, good luck.
__________________
Bill Hawk 1352 STK
Bill Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.