|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
442OLDS, larry has a 1986 chevy pickup already.Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Larry, first off Happy Anniversary! Wouldn't the "NEW CARS" qualify in the top portion of the 128 anyway based on the current factors?
Unless you tried to run them "as delivered", which none of the fast cars are.
__________________
Sam Tufano |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Still no supercharged cars?
__________________
BS/A,A/FIA 00 Camaro- CS/A, B/FIA 94 Camaro .2012 copo 4.0 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Paul,
It is just for Stock, not Super Stock FS/DC: Minimum weight 451 + CID 3200Lbs, all supercharged 3500Lbs, index 10.20
__________________
Sam Tufano Last edited by Comp 798; 03-28-2013 at 12:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,711 Times in 2,230 Posts
|
![]()
Lets look at the cars that missed the 128 car field. #134 was -.771 under now with the 0.30 index adjustment the same car will be -1.071 under, I know it is not fair to the rest of us that will not receive the same 0.30 index adjustment. #146 was -.705 under now with the add-on -1.075. What a disappointment in judgment by NHRA. How is this fair??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|