The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals - Page 2

Jeff Lee · 09-25-2012, 06:18 PM

Or maybe it was the HUGE HP increase Garret found AFTER the Carb was installed many races ago? Garret's run that Holley for a few years in IHRA (as it was accepted about 8+ years ago). Im not going to say what unleashed more HP because it''s not my position to say so. But he's teamed up with Adkins and he ain't no slouch on the dyno! The Holley is good but it's not NOS.

Tom Meyer · 09-25-2012, 10:56 PM

When I was racing my car a low 10.50 was about 125+ mph, was the mph slow for everybody at Columbus? Travis what was you mph at the 10.46? Tom

SStockDart · 09-25-2012, 11:17 PM

Tom, Since I am from Nebraska, I am going to chime in. As I recall, you race a 283.....Nebraska has no "sea level" tracks. Smaller cube engines kill MPH more than ET at altitude. 125 MPH should be around 10.35-40 at a sea level track. Correct me if I am wrong (it often happens....just ask my wife)....

Dick Butler · 09-26-2012, 07:53 AM

And Lots of people still spend LOTS of money to "enjoy" the events knowing the changes and the politics will always be the things which upset 90% of the racers. The only thing which ties everyone is the fact they dream of being the lucky 10% next season when their motor gets aftermarket heads, a bigger cam, a 3 speed trans or they win the lottery and buy a Mustang..

RANDY PAYNE · 09-26-2012, 12:13 PM

The little lt-1 's have been increased from 275 hp to 346 hp over the years. Maybe they will give us a 100lb. Back. Right' biggg

5919 SSKA · 09-27-2012, 11:31 AM

Tom, I ran 127.65 MPH

RON TAYLOR · 09-27-2012, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee

Or maybe it was the HUGE HP increase Garret found AFTER the Carb was installed many races ago? Garret's run that Holley for a few years in IHRA (as it was accepted about 8+ years ago). Im not going to say what unleashed more HP because it''s not my position to say so. But he's teamed up with Adkins and he ain't no slouch on the dyno! The Holley is good but it's not NOS.

290 cubic in 210 hp & 780 holly . give me a break should be 300 hp

Jeff Lee · 09-27-2012, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RON TAYLOR

290 cubic in 210 hp & 780 holly . give me a break should be 300 hp

5 HP greater than a '68 Z-28 302? Yea, I can tell you know allot about engines. Hey, 290's are a dime a dozen, jump right in!

RON TAYLOR · 09-27-2012, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee

5 HP greater than a '68 Z-28 302? Yea, I can tell you know allot about engines. Hey, 290's are a dime a dozen, jump right in!

well I have a 1957 chev 150 with 283 cu 245 hp that went 10.91 in ss/ma at 3610 lbs 490 lbs more than the amx . 11.85 index 94 under

Jeff Lee · 09-27-2012, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RON TAYLOR

well I have a 1957 chev 150 with 283 cu 245 hp that went 10.91 in ss/ma at 3610 lbs 490 lbs more than the amx . 11.85 index 94 under

Power glide or bogus t350 or t200 trans that was not even a gleam in Chevrolets eyes back in 1957?

09-25-2012, 06:18 PM	#11
Jeff Lee VIP Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Anthem, Arizona Posts: 2,766 Likes: 0 Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals Or maybe it was the HUGE HP increase Garret found AFTER the Carb was installed many races ago? Garret's run that Holley for a few years in IHRA (as it was accepted about 8+ years ago). Im not going to say what unleashed more HP because it''s not my position to say so. But he's teamed up with Adkins and he ain't no slouch on the dyno! The Holley is good but it's not NOS. __________________ Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX

09-25-2012, 10:56 PM	#12
Tom Meyer Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Pierce NE Posts: 936 Likes: 78 Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals When I was racing my car a low 10.50 was about 125+ mph, was the mph slow for everybody at Columbus? Travis what was you mph at the 10.46? Tom __________________ Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ???

09-25-2012, 11:17 PM	#13
SStockDart VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Arizona, Texan forever Posts: 1,176 Likes: 879 Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals Tom, Since I am from Nebraska, I am going to chime in. As I recall, you race a 283.....Nebraska has no "sea level" tracks. Smaller cube engines kill MPH more than ET at altitude. 125 MPH should be around 10.35-40 at a sea level track. Correct me if I am wrong (it often happens....just ask my wife).... __________________ Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911

09-26-2012, 07:53 AM	#14
Dick Butler VIP Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Richmond Indiana Posts: 1,196 Likes: 5 Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals And Lots of people still spend LOTS of money to "enjoy" the events knowing the changes and the politics will always be the things which upset 90% of the racers. The only thing which ties everyone is the fact they dream of being the lucky 10% next season when their motor gets aftermarket heads, a bigger cam, a 3 speed trans or they win the lottery and buy a Mustang..

09-26-2012, 12:13 PM	#15
RANDY PAYNE Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: ROME,GA. Posts: 197 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals The little lt-1 's have been increased from 275 hp to 346 hp over the years. Maybe they will give us a 100lb. Back. Right' biggg __________________ Randy Payne 2837 STK, SS

09-27-2012, 11:31 AM	#16
5919 SSKA Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sauk Rapids, MN Posts: 284 Likes: 20 Liked 19 Times in 5 Posts	Re: The other -1.200 run at Sportsnationals Tom, I ran 127.65 MPH __________________ Racing web page