|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
Use the SS GT rules for stock > i think IHRA does this not sure though
![]()
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,715 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
![]()
No sir, Don't like it. Don't like it one bit.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Live Reporter
|
![]()
I'm with you brother ......................
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 704
Likes: 128
Liked 497 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
When a new car and engine combination gets introduced into Stock or S/S, it should be over factored (2 HP per Cubic inch) so that it has to race to get weight off. It's totally stupid to allow the racers to determine if the car will get factored if they stay into it rather then lift at the 1000'. Either that or NHRA should take into the consideration of the 1/8 mile times with the MPH and look to factor them that way. If they did that, then the new rides would have to lift at the 330'. I would like to see the field get evened out so that EVERY new car doesn't qualifies at INDY see what it is like to watch other racers make into the field without really working on the car.
Casey Miles 248H "F" NHRA Stock! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I like the crate engine idea....believe it or not. But 383 Fastburn? It is 1985? And I doubt Chevrolet Performance would go for that. Now the LS376, LSX427, LSX454, LS3? That would be very cool.
__________________
Mike Ficacci Stk 1010 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
I think he is reffering to the 385 HP fast burn that alot of IHRA guys use.
__________________
Chris Bowman The Mountain State Mustang 1984 Mustang GT350 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Having not run a SS/GT car since 1990, I have a question about the GT cars. It was originally developed so those with older S/S cars could use the newer engines as long as that "style" motor was originally available in that "style" body. Is it now OK to use a newer body in GT?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
Unfortunately, that wouldn't even be considered for marketing reasons. Few, if any, people would want to make a big investment to start with a basically less than competitive car. Getting the cars out as they do creates a performance incentive to buy one and gives the factories a lot of exposure when their cars get out there and qualify well. It's good that the factories are involved. But it's totally in NHRA's hands as to how they are introduced into the ranks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|