|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Goin broke pm sent.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rancho Mirage, CA
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 300
Liked 881 Times in 452 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Congress has already ratified the treaty that states that when a treaty is signed it is binding till the senate tosses it or the president denounces it. It all makes sense and should be easy. But if there is a pocket-veto. We have to follow the treaty until it is rejected. There are already 58 senators that are voting against it. So why even sign it?
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rancho Mirage, CA
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 300
Liked 881 Times in 452 Posts
|
![]()
The whole treaty is to prevent countries from selling guns to other countries that have gross violations of human rights. Regardless of what regulations other countries agree to, the treaty only becomes law in the U.S. if it gets a two-thirds majority in the Senate.
And last month, more than 50 senators signed on to a letter to Secretary of State Clinton saying that they will not vote for any treaty that restricts civilian arms. The NRA is confident that the treaty will not be ratified in the U.S. The U.N. can pass it if they want it," NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam told FoxNews.com. But for it to have domestic effect, it needs to pass us senate by a two-thirds vote -- and clearly that will not happen in this make up of the U.S. senate, regardless of what the administration does. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|