|
![]() |
#41 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mills River, NC
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Ed, the four cyl. in Gen III Firebirds & Camaros was the Iron Duke.
I have a set of Gen III 4 cyl. frame mounts if anyone is intertested ( W/S or W/SA). I entertained the idea, but my wife let me know that she didn't want to drive anything that slow.
__________________
Bobby & Norene Zlatkin L/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 523
Liked 332 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
ED---82-84 F'bird/Camaro had the 2.5L 151 CU IN Iron Duke engine
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
That's why NHRA CALLED it ("Modified Compact.",) but in actuality, they just wanted to create a venue for Pontiac's Iron Duke. Why else would they have effectively eliminated the Pintos by making it a 151 cubic inch/2,350-pound class? They could just as easily specified 15.6 pounds per cubic inch. But that would have given the Pintos a 166-pound "advantage" and, given that the Ford 2,300 was already an OHC engine, they probably figured that the Iron Duke couldn't dominate with such a scenario.
It would have been interesting...
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marion,Ohio
Posts: 247
Likes: 48
Liked 50 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]()
I had one of these camaros with the iron duke, it is still sitting in the late bob wollets impound lot
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|