HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2012, 09:34 AM   #1
NWDragracing
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
The NHRA bent over backwards to ensure the success of the Iron Dukes in Modified Eliminator racing in several different ways: They made the Modified Compact a class like Pro Stock... 2,350 pounds and..... 151 cubic inches. No pounds-per-cubic inch. That "formula" just HAPPENED to fit the Iron Duke to a "T." The Ford engine (2,300 c.c.) was only 140 cubic inches and would need to be stroked ($$$$$$$$$$$$) to get the 151 cubic inches, discouraging a lot of potential Ford racers. When you've only got 151 cubic inches to work with, you can't afford to give any of 'em away...

The current rule book page, at the time, that described the requirements for a legal engine in a Modified Compact-classed race car, stipulated that the car had to have the original engine. The Pontiac T-1000 was a re-badged Chevy Chevette, a car that had its own engine. The T-1000 that Larry Nelson used to dominate the class never came with an Iron Duke, or anything like it. It came with a Chevette engine.

NHRA gave Pontiac the T-1000/Iron Duke combination under the "corporate engine" umbrella. Nobody else had a chance.

Another factory "GIMMEE."

No disrespect to Larry Nelson; he just took advantage of what was legal. Smart!!!
The same happened when the engine was used in a Firebird in Modified Compact. The rules stipulated "No Sports Cars Allowed".

I called Danny and and asked him if someone could run certain body styles in the class and he said "No" because they were Sports Cars.

So when I brought up the Firebird body, he said it was not a Sports Car; that the only Sports car GM had was the Corvette...
NWDragracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 12:57 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Is a Mustang a sports car?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 03:46 PM   #3
goinbroke2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,631
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Nope, pony car.
goinbroke2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 07:57 PM   #4
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Quote:
Originally Posted by goinbroke2 View Post
Nope, pony car.
Where do you see the difference?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 08:15 PM   #5
Hemi Moose
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

The Iron Duke (also called the 2500, 151, Pontiac 2.5, Cross Flow, and Tech IV, though the decal on the air filter assemblies actually reads "4 Tech") was a 2.5 L (150.8 cu in) I4 piston engine. All Iron Dukes were built by Pontiac beginning in 1977 and ending in 1993. After this time, the GM 2.2 L OHV 4-cylinder replaced it across the entire lineup of vehicles that offered it.

This 151 was also used by American Motors (AMC) starting in 1980, as the base engine option in the RWD Spirit and Concord, and continuing in both cars through 1982. The AWD (4x4) Eagle carried the 151 as standard equipment for 1981, and carried it midway through the 1983 model year. It was also available (as the Hurricane) in economy model Jeep CJs. AMC replaced the Iron Duke 2.5L I4 with a 150cid Inline-4 of their own, derived from their evergreen sixes.
The Iron Duke is often confused with Chevrolet's Stovebolt-derived 153 from the 1960s Chevy II, but the engines are entirely different - the Iron Duke's intake manifold is on the passenger side, as opposed to the driver side.
Applications:
More written here...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Iron_Duke_engine
Hemi Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 08:59 PM   #6
Hemi Moose
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Hemi Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 09:31 PM   #7
norm saibene
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

bob wollet was a great guy i use to race ihra with him he almost always qualified number 1 he was a stand up guy have nothing but good to say about him that is a awsome car he has
norm saibene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 07:32 AM   #8
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi Moose View Post
The Iron Duke (also called the 2500, 151, Pontiac 2.5, Cross Flow, and Tech IV, though the decal on the air filter assemblies actually reads "4 Tech") was a 2.5 L (150.8 cu in) I4 piston engine. All Iron Dukes were built by Pontiac beginning in 1977 and ending in 1993. After this time, the GM 2.2 L OHV 4-cylinder replaced it across the entire lineup of vehicles that offered it.

This 151 was also used by American Motors (AMC) starting in 1980, as the base engine option in the RWD Spirit and Concord, and continuing in both cars through 1982. The AWD (4x4) Eagle carried the 151 as standard equipment for 1981, and carried it midway through the 1983 model year. It was also available (as the Hurricane) in economy model Jeep CJs. AMC replaced the Iron Duke 2.5L I4 with a 150cid Inline-4 of their own, derived from their evergreen sixes.
The Iron Duke is often confused with Chevrolet's Stovebolt-derived 153 from the 1960s Chevy II, but the engines are entirely different - the Iron Duke's intake manifold is on the passenger side, as opposed to the driver side.
Applications:
More written here...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Iron_Duke_engine
This info is not correct if my memory is any good......The first year Pontiac engines had both intake and exhaust manifolds on the same side of the engine.....drivers side.
The following year the new and improved cross flow head was on that engine. Thats how I recall it and I worked in a Pontiac dealer and worked on those cars regularly.
GM was producing some real junk and as a line mechanic I got to work on all sorts of engineering marvels......

This was the era of "corporate engines under the hood". Engines were calibrated so lean they could barely get out the driveway sometimes without bucking and missing......and my personal favorite....the odd fire Buick V6 3.8....shook so bad they had to add counterweights and soft engine and trans mounts.

I have some very funny stories from my days working on these cars and what we did to try and diagnose and fix some of these cars.

It was a Pontiac-Jeep-Subaru dealership and I worked on them all as an A Tech....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 06:16 AM   #9
goinbroke2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,631
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Where do you see the difference?
Well Ed, the sports cars of the time were tiny european open top cars with 4 wheel independant suspension and the focus was on handling. (triumph/mg's/porche/etc.
While the mustang did compete in some "sporty car" races it was a 2+2 car that handled well (for that time period) and the focus was more on fun and affordability. It was at home on a twisty track but was also home on a dragstrip and had optional v-8 engines strictly for straight line.
Sports cars on the other hand were solely twisty cars and didn't accellerate well enough to compete in drag racing. A 1500lb car with 75hp was great zipping through the S's and switchbacks but laughable on a straightaway or dragstrip.

Now people car them musclecars which isn't right either. Musclecars were cars designed to purely go in a straight line, all muscle. A bigblock chevelle or torino or various hemi's fit that bill.

Camaro's/cuda's&challenger were all pony cars because they were built to fit into the "new" class of vehicle that the mustang started. Mustang, being a horse the class was called "pony".

Semantic's for the most part but the mustang was not intended to be or ever was comparable to a MG or triumph. (the same as a camaro was never meant to be)

Of course this is just my opinion too, the same as me hating imports is my opinion. hehehe
goinbroke2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 07:19 AM   #10
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Iron Dukes??

So how could the Firebirds be called sports cars? The NHRA official was correct, GM's only sports car then was the Corvette.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.