|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
Where is the love for the Chevy racer??? LOL
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
So, port shape, location, valve size, chamber size and shape, guide diameter, shape and height, etc, are all EXACTLY the same as stock? Outside of aluminum saving some nose weight, why did Edelbrock go to all the trouble?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Beavercreek Or.
Posts: 272
Likes: 31
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
They aren't the same configuration as stock heads, at least the small block Ford isn't. It's a Performer RPM head, bigger valves, better ports... I don't think it's a bad idea. A lot more cost effective than paying to build a set of SS heads. Yes I know the argument about escalating mods.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nashville, Tenn
Posts: 83
Likes: 104
Liked 24 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Easier to repair too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,106 Times in 303 Posts
|
![]()
I`m not sure if all the Edelbrock heads have no exhaust crossover passage or not, but I know many do. Yet with a factory head, you are not allowed to plug the crossover into the bowl area. Also, I`m pretty sure that not all the new heads approved use the same combustion chamber volume or valve sizes for every application that they are approved for. Interesting, eh?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Beavercreek Or.
Posts: 272
Likes: 31
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
I wish the Performer rpm heads were ok'd for stock too, especially for my 89 5.0l
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Like the Olds head, the Edelbrock is only specified for SS for the 429 CJ Ford motor (at a 10 HP premium), of which there has been exactly one built in the last 20 years, and it hasn't been run in two years. The stocker still has to run the OEM unobtainium version. And there are those who are bitching about the lack of Chevy heads... don't make me laugh...
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
The Edelbrock 383-440 Mopar heads are the same as the Mopar "452"aluminum heads Mopar sells thru MP.They are made for Mopar by Edelbrock,and are legal for S/S.The 2012 Flyer has a part number and says they are legal heads.The Edelbrock heads typically are cheaper price wise than the Mopar 452 aluminum heads.
The Eddy and 452 Mopar heads have 2.14 I and 1.81 E valves whereas the OEM iron head are 2.08 I and 1.74 E.
__________________
Nautilus Racing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: shelby, ohio
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
JOKE!!! just call it jr. comp
mike dean 3870 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|