HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > .90 Heads Up Class Racing
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2011, 10:16 AM   #21
fcffab
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442OLDS View Post
Did you Super racers need to run less delay than normal?

The rollout seemed high to me,but I don't know if my car was the problem,or if I was the problem.
I thought it was just me. Had nothing in the box .030 lights. I'll bring a smaller set of front tires to the replay in Sept.
fcffab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 12:22 PM   #22
Jeff Beckman
Member
 
Jeff Beckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jeff Beckman
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

Hey guys we are bitching about Stanton, Columbus is not near as bad in MHO.
__________________
Jeff Beckman 318J ET, SG
318T SC
Jeff Beckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 01:03 PM   #23
Gerber3533
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

IMO, Stanton wasn't too bad at all. Except for the huge bump in both lanes around the 330 mark, and then a pretty wavy groove in the right lane going through the mph cones. BUT, I will give it to the Ledford family, that track was prepped very well all weekend. They sprayed and scrapped before every class. Not too sure why my 60's we're so fast, but nonetheless, they were very consistent... That's WAY more than what I can say for Columbus. Not too happy w/ that place right now. For me, the discrepancy between one lane from the other is completely uncalled for... In Stanton, I varied 8 thou all weekend from one lane to the other. In Columbus, I was varying almost 4 hundreths. C'mon, let's be realistic... We all know beforehand that both of those tracks aren't the smoothest in the world, but the lack of consistency is not something we should not have to fight with. And in my eyes, Stanton did a lot better that Columbus did in that dept...
__________________
S/C 3275
S/G 3533
Gerber3533 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 01:10 PM   #24
Bob Verwold
Senior Member
 
Bob Verwold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fayetteville Ohio
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Beckman View Post
Hey guys we are bitching about Stanton, Columbus is not near as bad in MHO.

Thought that but wasn't going to say anything..........
Bob Verwold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 01:51 PM   #25
Eddie Arnold Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Solon , Ohio
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

Tom ,,, I know that was your line , I heard you tell Mr. Grahm that when we were at the 1st four wide Nationals ( Another disaster where half the Super Gasers couldn't get down the track !! ) --- Of course I'm coming to Maple ( one of my favorite places to race , Maple was where I had my first National Event Experience ) other than whipping up on me whenever I come up there you guys/all the Super Gas racers really make me fill welcome and I always have a great time ,, which is really important to me (if it was winning I would have quit a long time ago

I 'll have to agree with Adam because I did get down Stanton and my 60 Ft was pretty cosistent up to my last run ( where it picked up .025 against the winner , yea and I tried to
dump , get out of it but that .025 faster was to much for me to overcome without hitting the brakes hard and I don't do hard braking at 170 MPH ).

Columbus ,,, I'm struggling with if I should go or not , the Sports National is a great race and only 2.5 hours drive but if the track is weeping and I get put in the left lane , I'm toast and wasted my time and $$$$ .

Adam ,,, good job at Stanton ( getting down to 3 cars and now # 2 in the Division !!! )

Colorful Racer
__________________
Eddie Arnold Jr. 3934 SC, SG
Eddie Arnold Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 04:50 PM   #26
T Hall
Member
 
T Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Columbus Disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442OLDS View Post
Did you Super racers need to run less delay than normal?

The rollout seemed high to me,but I don't know if my car was the problem,or if I was the problem.
WOW! I thought it was me also, I took out .040 from my box and was still cutting .040-050 lights.
__________________
Tony Hall
3545 S/ST
T Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 07:00 PM   #27
Bill Webb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Columbus Disaster

I thought Columbus was fine until the seepage problem . Thats been a problem everywhere though.
Bill Webb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.