HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-29-2011, 09:42 PM   #71
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
9 AH, 12 A/SA, and 9 B/SA
Going to be good to watch.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 09:20 AM   #72
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Going to be good to watch.
Only if the accually race instead of playing games !
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 09:54 AM   #73
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

The competitors have been playing games since Chris landed in Santo Domingo. The current AHFS probably encourages more game playing say than 10 or so years ago, but that is the system we have. The current has difinitive numbers that can be manipulated easier than a system based on averages; i e eliminator average, combo average, class average or a combinatiion of. Averages make the system a moving target which it should be because both S & SS are dynamic eliminators, not static numbers. Combining averages (half season based on a few years or when the combo was hit last) and static (numbers that don't move) numbers (again the .850 and the rest 1.00, 1.20, 1.25 etc) don't mix well, sorta like Cherios and Buttermilk By the way, Chris was Christopher Columbus for the non-history fans. Too much coffee this morning.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 09:42 PM   #74
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
The competitors have been playing games since Chris landed in Santo Domingo. The current AHFS probably encourages more game playing say than 10 or so years ago, but that is the system we have. The current has difinitive numbers that can be manipulated easier than a system based on averages; i e eliminator average, combo average, class average or a combinatiion of. Averages make the system a moving target which it should be because both S & SS are dynamic eliminators, not static numbers. Combining averages (half season based on a few years or when the combo was hit last) and static (numbers that don't move) numbers (again the .850 and the rest 1.00, 1.20, 1.25 etc) don't mix well, sorta like Cherios and Buttermilk By the way, Chris was Christopher Columbus for the non-history fans. Too much coffee this morning.


Jeez Jeff,you know Chris?You're older than I thought.
BTW did you get the package?
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 09:49 AM   #75
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,649
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,759 Times in 2,236 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

My horse got scratched from the A/SA race as of tomorrow's 15 Hp. The only new Ford left will be the Super Stock 428, you know 14.24 compression, .850 lift, solid rollers, Nascar intake, 1000 CFM throttle body, at 375 Hp.

Its corruption at the top, the tech. dept. knows its way wrong, they are doing what they are told.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 10:30 AM   #76
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

I have a question about how these piece meal motors from Ford and Mopar are getting put into Stock? Are they crate motors? If so why are they in stock? I spoke to a friend of mine ( which are few) and he told me that the 352 Ford engine isn't anything you car get as a whole, you have to buy the parts and put it together. I know that there was question about the Shelby cars, but if what my friend is correct, the Shelby cars are no big deal. Stock may as well be call Modified product. If you think about it, Stock is allow exotic materials (Shubeck lifters) Pro Stock is not, just about any transmission along with rear ends and it seems any motor combo that the factories can think of now.
I try to keep my car close to stock and it's a far cry from what's going on now. If the factories want to through engines into stock, NHRA should put them at least 1.25 HP per cubic inch rather then some make believe HP that the factory says it is. NHRA should support Stock as Stock and force the factories to build the cars as production cars, not just 50 of them, if they build that many. Stock has been an Eliminator class now for over 37 years and now it's changing with no reguard for where it came from. Stock were cars in sheep's clothing running like wolfs, now it just wolfs!

Casey Miles
248H Stock

Last edited by Casey Miles; 08-01-2011 at 10:31 AM. Reason: spelling
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 10:51 AM   #77
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 702
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
I have a question about how these piece meal motors from Ford and Mopar are getting put into Stock? Are they crate motors? If so why are they in stock? I spoke to a friend of mine ( which are few) and he told me that the 352 Ford engine isn't anything you car get as a whole, you have to buy the parts and put it together. I know that there was question about the Shelby cars, but if what my friend is correct, the Shelby cars are no big deal. Stock may as well be call Modified product. If you think about it, Stock is allow exotic materials (Shubeck lifters) Pro Stock is not, just about any transmission along with rear ends and it seems any motor combo that the factories can think of now.
I try to keep my car close to stock and it's a far cry from what's going on now. If the factories want to through engines into stock, NHRA should put them at least 1.25 HP per cubic inch rather then some make believe HP that the factory says it is. NHRA should support Stock as Stock and force the factories to build the cars as production cars, not just 50 of them, if they build that many. Stock has been an Eliminator class now for over 37 years and now it's changing with no reguard for where it came from. Stock were cars in sheep's clothing running like wolfs, now it just wolfs!

Casey Miles
248H Stock
That's why these new cars are so ridiculous. They are purpose built race motors from a performance parts catalog with bogus HP factors. Nothing Stock about it.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 01:38 PM   #78
dwydendorf
Member
 
dwydendorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 251
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
I have a question about how these piece meal motors from Ford and Mopar are getting put into Stock? Are they crate motors? If so why are they in stock? I spoke to a friend of mine ( which are few) and he told me that the 352 Ford engine isn't anything you car get as a whole, you have to buy the parts and put it together. I know that there was question about the Shelby cars, but if what my friend is correct, the Shelby cars are no big deal. Stock may as well be call Modified product. If you think about it, Stock is allow exotic materials (Shubeck lifters) Pro Stock is not, just about any transmission along with rear ends and it seems any motor combo that the factories can think of now.
I try to keep my car close to stock and it's a far cry from what's going on now. If the factories want to through engines into stock, NHRA should put them at least 1.25 HP per cubic inch rather then some make believe HP that the factory says it is. NHRA should support Stock as Stock and force the factories to build the cars as production cars, not just 50 of them, if they build that many. Stock has been an Eliminator class now for over 37 years and now it's changing with no reguard for where it came from. Stock were cars in sheep's clothing running like wolfs, now it just wolfs!

Casey Miles
248H Stock
When I started going to the Drags in 1970 Stock wasn't Stock back then. I am really sorry that Stock doesn't fit everyones idea of what Stock shoud be. Everyone that thinks the new factory combos that are different than the old combos in stock need to get over it. Back in the early 70's you could run cheater slicks,headers. cheater cams, and aftermarket pistons. These were hardly items available on factory built cars back then and yet some people continue to whine about the new factory combinations. Maybe you guys should run an IHRA pure stocker, as it may be more in tune of what you think Stock should be. I know NHRA went to a Pure Stock format in the early 1970's that has evolved into stock today but there is nothing about Stock that is Pure Stock even before the new factory combinations came into Stock.
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird

Last edited by dwydendorf; 08-01-2011 at 01:47 PM.
dwydendorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 01:59 PM   #79
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Angry Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwydendorf View Post
When I started going to the Drags in 1970 Stock wasn't Stock back then. I am really sorry that Stock doesn't fit everyones idea of what Stock shoud be. Everyone that thinks the new factory combos that are different than the old combos in stock need to get over it. Back in the early 70's you could run cheater slicks,headers. cheater cams, and aftermarket pistons. These were hardly items available on factory built cars back then and yet some people continue to whine about the new factory combinations. Maybe you guys should run an IHRA pure stocker, as it may be more in tune of what you think Stock should be. I know NHRA went to a Pure Stock format in the early 1970's that has evolved into stock today but there is nothing about Stock that is Pure Stock even before the new factory combinations came into Stock.
You just dont get it. it has NOTHING to about the fact that they are new cars with FI, computers, etc. and use aftermarket parts like every other stocker or S/S car on the planet. Its the frigging HORSE POWER RATINGS that bogus or in plain english....screwed up !
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 02:36 PM   #80
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Class At Indy

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwydendorf View Post
When I started going to the Drags in 1970 Stock wasn't Stock back then. I am really sorry that Stock doesn't fit everyones idea of what Stock shoud be. Everyone that thinks the new factory combos that are different than the old combos in stock need to get over it. Back in the early 70's you could run cheater slicks,headers. cheater cams, and aftermarket pistons. These were hardly items available on factory built cars back then and yet some people continue to whine about the new factory combinations. Maybe you guys should run an IHRA pure stocker, as it may be more in tune of what you think Stock should be. I know NHRA went to a Pure Stock format in the early 1970's that has evolved into stock today but there is nothing about Stock that is Pure Stock even before the new factory combinations came into Stock.
Sorry but you are wrong, when NHRA started Stock after Jr. Stock, about 1973, you had to have all the stock parts, except the cheater cam because they had no way of checking the cam. Stock got bastardized as people complained that they couldn't run the stock parts without breakage.

BTW, here is the rating for the Viper V-10 engine for sale in the real world:
510 cu in (8.4 L)[9] V10
600 bhp (450 kW) @ 6000 rpm
560 lb·ft (760 N·m) @ 5600 rpm
This is what we are talking about, the bogus rating of the engines. I'm sure that this engine has to run on unleaded fuel since it's street driven, the race engine doesn't which means more compression the the street version. NHRA rates the V-10 @ 456 HP, aren't we missing something like at least 150 HP. This is what is pissing peolpe who run Stock for so many years. You can't compete against the pen and "A"holes who write with it.

Casey Miles
248H Stock?
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.