New Horse Power Ratings - Page 5

BlueOval Ralph · 07-15-2011, 06:33 PM

Even Danny gets new Ford or Lincoln to drive

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another Friendly Racer

Ford is the official vehicle of NHRA, that's how you lower the horsepower. You guys on here care about stock and super stock racing but the NHRA suits care about money. If you want your horsepower lowered, try attaching a check next time you write them a letter.

Mickey Whaley · 07-15-2011, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clutch man

is this the same J/S stocker that went 10.59 in testing?

in J/S went 10.59 this has to be BS!

Brad Zaskowski · 07-16-2011, 12:04 AM

I will give you a George Foreman guarantee that that car has never gone close to 10.59! That ride is one fast SOB but not that fast.
It is amazing how fast and far great rumors like that spread.

Billy Nees · 07-16-2011, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Zaskowski

I will give you a George Foreman guarantee that that car has never gone close to 10.59! That ride is one fast SOB but not that fast.
It is amazing how fast and far great rumors like that spread.

"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story!"

Mike Fuller · 07-16-2011, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Zaskowski

I will give you a George Foreman guarantee that that car has never gone close to 10.59! That ride is one fast SOB but not that fast.
It is amazing how fast and far great rumors like that spread.

How about 10.937? Is that pretty close?

Tom Moock · 07-16-2011, 09:56 AM

Brad, How about 123mph. in E/FI at Martin, Mi. Tom

Mickey Whaley · 07-16-2011, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Moock

Brad, How about 123mph. in E/FI at Martin, Mi. Tom

thats 10.50 to 10.60 range if that is a j/s car thats not even funny

Michael Iacono · 07-16-2011, 11:31 AM

anybody know what 68-70 428 was at 389?
i thought the n head motor was 380 and the aluminum head motor was at 383
thanks

Andrew Hill · 07-16-2011, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Moock

Brad, How about 123mph. in E/FI at Martin, Mi. Tom

It went 129 testing, what a joke.

I can't blame someone for building an underfactored car like this, but writing a letter to get horsepower off, absolutely ridiculous.

lstanford · 07-16-2011, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deuces wild

Those HP increases didn't do much to slow down the Mustangs. Cour's AA/SA car is sitting Number 1 right now at Woodburn.

Ok, a one and a two. Let's all sing "Cry Me A River".

07-16-2011, 12:04 AM	#43
Brad Zaskowski Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Posts: 203 Likes: 132 Liked 130 Times in 20 Posts	Re: New Horse Power Ratings I will give you a George Foreman guarantee that that car has never gone close to 10.59! That ride is one fast SOB but not that fast. It is amazing how fast and far great rumors like that spread. __________________ Brad Zaskowski 3697 STK, SS

07-16-2011, 09:56 AM	#46
Tom Moock Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 801 Likes: 1 Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts	Re: New Horse Power Ratings Brad, How about 123mph. in E/FI at Martin, Mi. Tom __________________ Tom Moock 5704 STK

07-16-2011, 11:31 AM	#48
Michael Iacono Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 119 Likes: 8 Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts	Re: New Horse Power Ratings anybody know what 68-70 428 was at 389? i thought the n head motor was 380 and the aluminum head motor was at 383 thanks