|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burlington, WA
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The issue is, that has never been the rule. A track manager selectively chose to change the way it had always been run. Read the NHRA Summit E.T. Racing rules. It says nothing about a breakout-only the 12.00 limit in Sportsman. Phil has a gripe here. It again comes down to interpretation of NHRA rules. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff I was thinking of specific index such as 12:00 to 12:99 and 11:00 to 11:99 If this was explained at the beginning of the year at the racers meeting than it's whatever the track owner sets as his rules. Dale Wilson former editor of Bracket Racing USA had an article on the subject many years ago dealing with this problem and his recommendation was to go to the track management and ask for the rules of his track( every time you went to a new track). Now if the management is changing what is their official rules halfway through the year, now that is different. Just go to another track if one is available. Claude
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burlington, WA
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The rest of the NHRA tracks-that compete in the NHRA's Summit E.T. Racing Series-do not do it the same way. This presents a problem. Mission Raceway is among the elite in the Division, and to have the rules change mid-way-without the input from the racers (which is the way they always have done it)-undermines the Mission Team's ability to compete on a level playing field, and alienates the racers. If NHRA did this as a wide, sweeping change of the rules across the Nation, then I would agree that everyone is in the same boat. But, to change at one track-on the whim of a Manager- is unacceptable. This is why tracks have Class representatives. Apparantly, they were not advised of the proposed rule change. I have no dog in this fight, but right is right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chewelah wa
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
sorry phillip i didnt get what you were saying, if they go faster than 12.00 in sportsman they should loose period
__________________
larry dowty 6388 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lynden ,WA
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Larry, The winners of the E.T finals that go to Pomona for the world championship don't get Dq'd for breaking out, Why should I?
__________________
2009 V/SA Record Holder |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
For those who are confused, Phil is not talking about a dial-in or an index. He is discussing the "top and bottom" of the elapsed time "breaks" for a given eliminator.
As an example, many tracks offer Super Pro Eliminator "breaks" of 6.50 seconds to 11.99 seconds indicating the minimum and maximum permitted dial-ins. Phil is describing a Sportsman Eliminator "top break", (minimum dial-in), of 12.00 seconds. In this scenario, he was dialed "at the break" of 12.00 and won a double-breakout race, (or ran all-out on a single), with an 11.99 or quicker. This has been the only real "rule" in bracket racing performance since the genre was created in the early 1960s. While the class "breaks" vary between tracks, the minimum dial-in has always been the only dividing line between eliminator categories. A handful of tracks do offer warnings but most simply disqualify the driver who "walks the tightrope" by dialing on the "break" and slipping. Ironically, I find this rule almost universally in place at non-sanctioned tracks. The NHRA and IHRA have a "courtesy rule" in the Junior Dragster ranks in which the first violation is overlooked but, when racing "big cars", you take your chances. It's all part of the game. Anybody who races at a track which allows two violations in one day is lucky. The fact you still get one free ride is extremely rare and, Phil, you should be grateful for it. Most folks would simply be shown the gate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
It looks like most of you still dont understand what phil is talking about. In sportsman class you can not put a dial in on quicker than 12.00 that is the rule at all div 6 tracks.This is new for this year at the div 6 et finals. Last year it was 12.80 for all the tracks you could not dial quicker than 12.80.But if you turned 12.79 or quicker you were not dq it is just a brake out.closes to the dial wins just like it should be. Turning 11.99 on a 12.00 dial is no difference its just a brake out. Ive been racing in the bracket classes for 42 years and ive seen a lot of rule changes and to be dq for brakeing out on a legal dial in of any kind isnt one of them. The bottom line is you can not put a dial in on that is quicker than the class your running if you brake out its just that a brake out and may the best racer win. If you still dont under stand get a hold of the div 6 tech director and he will explain to you.DON THE WORM ELGIN
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lynden ,WA
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the post Don, I think this whole thing is your fault for letting me get past first round anyways, LOL. Thank's again buddy.
I have heard that the Div6 director has been put in the position to dq racers a few times now and has not. That makes it pretty clear that breaking out is not a rulebook violation. Thanks for all your input guy's, Phillip
__________________
2009 V/SA Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
disqualify everyboby then they can shut the gate because of this steupid *** rule?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|