|
![]() |
#51 |
Member
|
![]()
i will let you in on a little insight on jeff's new car it will have a one of a kind new clutch made by a cajun down in dulac la by a man named herman bodwin. it is so advanced this clutch was used in a skiff by herman himself for r and d this clutch is so good it will add 50 hp to the new car so watch out racer's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.fordracingparts.com/cobra...e%20Retail.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...ns_120910.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Benton, Arkansas
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
With the way stockers are being built today, like MPR B&B etc, safety will not be an issue with the new cars going as fast as they are. And I would not compare them to outlaw classes where you have big inch, big horsepower cars, on small tires, running on marginal tracks. Actually, to at least the 330, the newer cars are much less violent than the older cars that are getting much higher in the air. If they are put in their own class with a lighter weight break, it shouldnt be a safety problem. When you think about how fast some of the other class cars of yesterday have ran,(like Top Stock, superstock, even modified) and compare them and how they were built, to the new cars, the new cars are safer. As far as the safety hazard on stock suspension, they are going in the 7's with it now, so I think stockers will be fine. Jeff is trying to get some input to help with the problem. I am pretty sure he is on our side on all of this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,576
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
No problem,they'll just legislate all of us slow guys (N and down)out.What the hell,there aren't many of us,we don't spend a ton of money on parts and chassis shops and we take to long to get to the stripe.That interferes with the TV time for the pros.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,576
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, I'd say again that A/FX thru D/FX, with A/FX at 7.0 and D/FX at 10.0 would be a good start. I think the current ratings on the new cars will work fine at 7.0, (they'll be significantly lighter than say a ZL-1 or an L-88 forced to run at 7.5 in AA) and if you were to make the A/FX index at 10.20, that would allow the new cars to go plenty fast. They'd have to go 9.00 to go 1.20 under. That gives them 0.40 more to work with than the current index for AA which is 10.60. That would let you guys hold 4 tenths over the traditional cars.
Isn't 9 flat at over 150MPH fast enough for Stock Eliminator?
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|