HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2011, 12:55 PM   #51
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 456
Liked 16,540 Times in 1,521 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Jeff, it is obvious you do not know that facts on this issue, why you continue to comment without all the info is beyond me.

This is reason I was told at Gainesville, "your car never came with an aluminum center section, therefore it is not legal." The official told me it was not a performance advantage. Why do you not believe me?

Can we now put the performance issue to rest.
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 01:36 PM   #52
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Miele View Post
Jeff, it is obvious you do not know that facts on this issue, why you continue to comment without all the info is beyond me.

This is reason I was told at Gainesville, "your car never came with an aluminum center section, therefore it is not legal." The official told me it was not a performance advantage. Why do you not believe me?

Can we now put the performance issue to rest.
Because...there are MANY things in Stock Eliminator that are NOT allowed DESPITE the fact (perceived or real) they are NOT A PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGE. I'm sure you understand this. Some items are better because they don't break (perhaps aluminum rocker arms as just one example), some items are better because you can shift one problem area to a more easily rectified problem area (again, my example in previous posts about moving weight around (and I can't believe you don't think there is something in that; if not for you, then others), and some issues with NHRA is because it just doesn't "fit the picture" of Stock (a truly ambiguous statement if there ever was one but reality in many instances just the same).
To summarize; a part does not have to be directly attributable as performance enhancing part to receive consideration for inclusion in the allowable rules. The part may be viewed by some as equal or possibly even worse but that position is not all that is considered.
Now at this point, you may be sitting on a letter granting approval. If so, I say congratulations. If not, I believe the opinions I have expressed are part of the rationale behind the decision to not allowing the part.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 05:39 PM   #53
FINESPLINE
Senior Member
 
FINESPLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Along time ago when stock was closer to real stock wasn't the saying that If the rule book does not specifically say you can't---than you can ! This is what fostered the interpretation of the rules. Now, they reverse it. Nice to play both sides of the fence.
FINESPLINE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 07:00 PM   #54
chris ok
Senior Member
 
chris ok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New york
Posts: 592
Likes: 131
Liked 46 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

I ilke the idea of an aluminum center to save your back when sevicing the car fitting it off or on. We aren't getting any younger.
chris ok is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.