|
![]() |
#51 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 456
Liked 16,540 Times in 1,521 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, it is obvious you do not know that facts on this issue, why you continue to comment without all the info is beyond me.
This is reason I was told at Gainesville, "your car never came with an aluminum center section, therefore it is not legal." The official told me it was not a performance advantage. Why do you not believe me? Can we now put the performance issue to rest. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
To summarize; a part does not have to be directly attributable as performance enhancing part to receive consideration for inclusion in the allowable rules. The part may be viewed by some as equal or possibly even worse but that position is not all that is considered. Now at this point, you may be sitting on a letter granting approval. If so, I say congratulations. If not, I believe the opinions I have expressed are part of the rationale behind the decision to not allowing the part.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Along time ago when stock was closer to real stock wasn't the saying that If the rule book does not specifically say you can't---than you can ! This is what fostered the interpretation of the rules. Now, they reverse it. Nice to play both sides of the fence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New york
Posts: 592
Likes: 131
Liked 46 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
I ilke the idea of an aluminum center to save your back when sevicing the car fitting it off or on. We aren't getting any younger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|